The European Green Deal improves the sustainability of food systems but has uneven economic impacts on consumers and farmers

Abstract

The European Green Deal aims notably to achieve a fair, healthy, and environmentally friendly food system in the European Union. We develop a partial equilibrium economic model to assess the market and non-market impacts of the three main levers of the Green Deal targeting the food chain: reducing the use of chemical inputs in agriculture, decreasing post-harvest losses, and shifting toward healthier average diets containing lower quantities of animal-based products. Substantially improving the climate, biodiversity, and nutrition performance of the European food system requires jointly using the three levers. This allows a 20% reduction in greenhouse gas emissions of food consumption and a 40–50% decrease in biodiversity damage. Consumers win economically thanks to lower food expenditures. Livestock producers lose through quantity and price declines. Impacts on revenues of food/feed field crop producers are positive only when the increase in food consumption products outweighs the decrease in feed consumption.

Diagnosis of the Development of Energy Cooperatives in Poland—A Case Study of a Renewable Energy Cooperative in the Upper Silesian Region

“…The industrial transformation from fossil fuels to renewable energy sources (RES) is a prerequisite for achieving sustainable socio-economic systems in the world. Sustainable development of economies, starting in the 1970s and first recorded in the Bruntland Report [29], has accelerated, in recent years, toward RESs and zero CO 2 emissions [30,31]. The net-zero strategy is difficult for countries that produce energy from hard coal and lignite, such as Poland, where 70% of the energy is black energy [32].…”

A “Teal” Deal for European agriculture

“…The EGD pursues a worldwide shift towards competitive sustainability across the entire food supply chain, and to diminish the environmental and climate impact of the EU's agrifood system 4 whilst enhancing its resilience to external shocks and ensuring food security amidst geopolitical uncertainties (European Commission, 2023a). In particular, by 2030, it aims to i) halve the utilization and risk associated with chemical pesticides by 50%, as well as decreasing the use of more hazardous pesticides by 50%, ii) decrease nutrient losses by a minimum of 50% (while ensuring soil fertility does not decline), and reduce fertilizer usage by at least 20%, iii) cut the sales of antimicrobials for farm animals and aquaculture by 50%, iv) achieve 25% of total farmland under organic farming, v) allocate 10% of farmland to high-diversity landscape features, and vi) diminish per capita food waste at the retail and consumer levels by half, all while reducing greenhouse gas emissions by at least 55% (compared to 1990) (Guyomard et al, 2023). Admittedly, distinguishing which strategies of the EGD affect European agriculture is complicated.…”