25th AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference 2007
DOI: 10.2514/6.2007-4296
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The European High Lift Project EUROLIFT II - Objectives, Approach, and Structure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Compared with the experimental results, C L and C M tend to be over-predicted and under-predicted (i.e., the pitch-down moment tends to be over-predicted), respectively. The tendencies of the over-prediction and under-prediction are reasonable because the computational geometry "Config 2" for Case 1 omitted the slat and flap brackets and the existence of brackets generally increases the flow separation over the wing and flap and results in decreasing C L and increasing C M (i.e., decreasing the pitch-down moment) as discussed in [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11]14]. The results on all the grids and the extrapolated grid converged solution with the SA model show higher C L and lower C M (i.e., more pitch-down moment) than those with the SST model.…”
Section: Comparison Of Grid Convergence Of Aerodynamic Forcesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Compared with the experimental results, C L and C M tend to be over-predicted and under-predicted (i.e., the pitch-down moment tends to be over-predicted), respectively. The tendencies of the over-prediction and under-prediction are reasonable because the computational geometry "Config 2" for Case 1 omitted the slat and flap brackets and the existence of brackets generally increases the flow separation over the wing and flap and results in decreasing C L and increasing C M (i.e., decreasing the pitch-down moment) as discussed in [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11]14]. The results on all the grids and the extrapolated grid converged solution with the SA model show higher C L and lower C M (i.e., more pitch-down moment) than those with the SST model.…”
Section: Comparison Of Grid Convergence Of Aerodynamic Forcesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generation of computational grids with high quality around the complicated whole configurations is time-consuming and precise prediction of aerodynamic forces, such as C L max and L∕D, for the three-dimensional high-lift configurations is still a challenging task. In European high-lift projects [8][9][10], efforts to validate and improve computational fluid dynamics (CFD) technologies for the precise prediction have been conducted through the European High Lift Programs, EUROLIFT [8] and EUROLIFT II [9] and the High-lift INflight VAlidation (HINVA) project [10]. In Japan, CFD validation studies for high-lift flows have been conducted with a series of wind tunnel tests using a realistic civil aircraft configuration (Config) [3][4][5][11][12][13][14][15][16].…”
Section: Armentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Several higher order schemes have also been developed, and the accuracy of CFD for steady flows has become good enough for use in engineering design (1) . Recently, interest in CFD has begun to focus on unsteady flows, such as helicopter blades (2) , high-lift configuration (3) , and noise (4) . However, there are still uncertainties in CFD, such as boundary conditions, initial conditions, turbulence models, time step sizes, and grid resolution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%