2010
DOI: 10.1177/0267323110373460
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The European paradox: A communication deficit as long as European integration steals the headlines

Abstract: In 2007, the Dutch state secretary for European affairs lamented the narrow focus on the rules of European integration in the public debate, overshadowing the EU’s impact on citizens’ daily lives. This study compares the amount and type of news about the EU in the British, French and Dutch press during the period 1990—2003. A content analysis of Dutch EU coverage for the years 2004 up to 2006 was subsequently undertaken, which saw key events such as the EU enlargement and referenda on the constitution. The res… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…And while it is not possible to change the news at one’s will, this study could help inform how the EU communicates its activities to journalists. This is particularly relevant, given the EU’s notorious ‘communication deficit’ and the fact that the EU typically only becomes visible in the media during crises (Van Noije, 2010). However, the results also show that there are some distrustful citizens whose opinions can hardly be swayed by media content.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…And while it is not possible to change the news at one’s will, this study could help inform how the EU communicates its activities to journalists. This is particularly relevant, given the EU’s notorious ‘communication deficit’ and the fact that the EU typically only becomes visible in the media during crises (Van Noije, 2010). However, the results also show that there are some distrustful citizens whose opinions can hardly be swayed by media content.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a similar vein, De Vreese et al (2007) find that the 1999 EP elections were more visible in countries with high levels of elite polarization on EU issues. Moreover, the findings from longitudinal studies also indicate that journalists pay more attention to EU affairs when an Intergovernmental Conference or Council meeting takes place or when a new European Commission is installed (Peter and De Vreese, 2004;Boomgaarden et al, 2010Boomgaarden et al, , 2013Van Noije, 2010).…”
Section: Media Coverage and Legislative Politics In The Eumentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Competition on EU issues is primarily used by parties who have never been part of government coalitions (Van de Wardt et al, 2014). In combination with the tendency of media to concentrate on negative news, this results in the paradox that more media attention for Europe may be detrimental for trust in Europe (Van Noije, 2010;Van Spanje & De Vreese, 2014;Vliegenthart, Schuck, Boomgaarden, & De Vreese, 2008).…”
Section: Electoral Consequences Of Party Emphasis On Eu Issuesmentioning
confidence: 99%