2016
DOI: 10.1136/esmoopen-2016-000066
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The European Society for Medical Oncology Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale in daily practice: a single institution, real-life experience at the Medical University of Vienna

Abstract: BackgroundThe European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale (MCBS) has been designed to stratify the therapeutic benefit of a certain drug registered for the treatment of cancer. However, though internally validated, this tool has not yet been evaluated for its feasibility in the daily practice of a major center of medical oncology.MethodsThe practicability of the MCBS for advanced oncological diseases at the Clinical Division of Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, which … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 89 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These findings also provide evidence for the frameworks' face validity, indicating that framework-driven decisions may reflect those made in clinical practice. 28 The complexity of the underlying data used to complete the assessments may have in turn influenced clinical concordance. Specifically, panelists appeared to more easily apply the correct numbers for the prostate cancer drugs than they did for breast and lung cancer drugs.…”
Section: ■■ Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These findings also provide evidence for the frameworks' face validity, indicating that framework-driven decisions may reflect those made in clinical practice. 28 The complexity of the underlying data used to complete the assessments may have in turn influenced clinical concordance. Specifically, panelists appeared to more easily apply the correct numbers for the prostate cancer drugs than they did for breast and lung cancer drugs.…”
Section: ■■ Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15] However, a maximum score of 3 is clearly inferior to results achieved for metastatic breast or colorectal Kiesewetter cancer. 5 This fact might possibly be related to the inferior power of trials in infrequent diseases. In addition, we could identify several trials relevant to our practice that added new data to the field but per definition did not meet their statistical endpoint.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar results were also obtained in our analysis for common entities exemplified by PD-1 inhibition in non-small cell lung cancer and renal cell cancer providing a stringent concept for the use of the ESMO-MCBS in the era of immunomodulatory treatment. 5 The limitations of the ESMO-MCBS were clinical settings where a cascade-like treatment algorithm is standard of care. While the ESMO-MCBS in its current version allows assessment of multiple studies in form of meta-analyses, it is not possible to interconnect or combine the results of two or more distinct trials.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The paper published in the current issue of ESMO Open by Kiesewetter et al 2 describes the first real life assessment of the ESMO-MCBS within a big comprehensive cancer centre. Medical University Vienna is one of the biggest and most important centres in Europe, and physicians in the Clinical Division of Oncology have applied the methodology to their daily clinical practice in treating patients.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%