2013
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-35828-9_1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The EVALITA Dependency Parsing Task: From 2007 to 2011

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This result needs to be further investigated through other experiments, but it suggests that the treebank has currently reached an adequate size. It is moreover interesting to note the variation of the performance with respect to text genres, which is around the same in all the EPT editions and is confirmed also in the dependency parsing track [6]. The language of the Civil Law Code shows in all the analyzed EVALITA experiences scores higher than for the other text genres (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 57%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This result needs to be further investigated through other experiments, but it suggests that the treebank has currently reached an adequate size. It is moreover interesting to note the variation of the performance with respect to text genres, which is around the same in all the EPT editions and is confirmed also in the dependency parsing track [6]. The language of the Civil Law Code shows in all the analyzed EVALITA experiences scores higher than for the other text genres (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 57%
“…Finally, even if in 2011 they show a substantial improvement, the results for constituency parsing remain significantly lower than those achieved by applying dependency-based approaches (see [6]). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Over the years, many challenging tasks have been proposed with the aim of advancing stateof-the-art technologies in different NLP areas: to mention only a few, dependency parsing (Nivre et al, 2007), (Bosco and Mazzei, 2013), textual entailment (Bos et al, 2009), frame labeling (Basili et al, 2013) and cross-document event ordering , all requiring cutting-edge methods and techniques as well as innovative approaches.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indian languages [40] or German [44]), non-canonical variants of languages [54] as well as for morphologically rich languages [70]. EVALITA has organized dependency parsing tasks focusing on Italian since 2007 [16]. These campaigns fostered both the creation of dependency treebanks and the development of dependency parsers exploiting different approaches.…”
Section: Dependency Parsing -Dpmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The EVENTI exercise is based on the EVENTI Annotation Guidelines 16 tualities following semantic and syntactic criteria so to facilitate temporal and factual reasoning [66].…”
Section: Data: Annotation and Preparationmentioning
confidence: 99%