1956
DOI: 10.1177/004051755602600505
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Evaluation of Bacteriostatic Reagents and Methods of Application to Textile Fabrics

Abstract: Several methods for assessing the extent of bacteriostasis possessed by a treated textile fabric are extant but none is highly objective. The method described in this paper is offered for its relatively high degree of precision and its similarity to the natural function which it is designed to evaluate. Details of the method, of reagent chemical types, and of the effects of concentration of reagent are presented. In addition, results of applica tion of reagents to fabrics in field trials in operating laundry p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1960
1960
2003
2003

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The use of antimicrobial agents in textile, paper, paints, leather, and other materials has led to the development of various testing methods [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12] for evaluating the antimicrobial property of the treated products. One procedure frequently used is the standardized method [1] by American Association of Textile Chemists and Colorists (AATCC-90, 1970), which is based upon an agar diffusion plate method [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of antimicrobial agents in textile, paper, paints, leather, and other materials has led to the development of various testing methods [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12] for evaluating the antimicrobial property of the treated products. One procedure frequently used is the standardized method [1] by American Association of Textile Chemists and Colorists (AATCC-90, 1970), which is based upon an agar diffusion plate method [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many reports about the activity of the antibacterial fabrics were found (Akeson and Cooper, 1967;lsquith et al, 1972;Lee et al, 1999;Payne, 1997;Seong et al, 1999;Sherrill, 1956;Sun and Xu, 1998;Vigo et al, 1999). However, there was little reported on the effect of dirty materials and microorganisms on the antibacterial activity of antibacterialdeodorant fabrics after being used (Mizuoue, 1972;Nakashima et al, 1987;Yuge, 1961;Yuge et al, 1963).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case of agents which strongly adhere to the fabric, or those poorly diffusible in agar, the diffusion method results may not be of practical significance. Numerous other methods, reported from time to time (Britt and Schweiger,195)2; Latlief et al, 1952;Church and Loosli, 1953;Goldsmith et al, 1954;Sherrill, 1956;Crone, 1958;Schwabacher et al, 1958;McNeil et al, 1960), are based on the removal of the antimicrobial agent from the fabric and subsequent measurement of it by chemical or biological means. None of these methods, however, directly measures the ability of the treated fabric to inhibit microbial growth.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%