2018
DOI: 10.1007/s12206-018-1118-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The evaluation of numerical methods for determining the efficiency of Tesla turbine operation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Research has shown that Tesla turbines applied to small-scale Rankine systems can achieve isentropic efficiencies greater than 75%. The model is confirmed to give results in agreement with numerical simulations of real turbines [9], and further improvements of this model are presented in [10][11], where the flow is treated as turbulent and compressible considering the radial pressure gradient. The model agrees well with the experimental data in the low and medium ranges of rotational speed but differs at high speeds.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 65%
“…Research has shown that Tesla turbines applied to small-scale Rankine systems can achieve isentropic efficiencies greater than 75%. The model is confirmed to give results in agreement with numerical simulations of real turbines [9], and further improvements of this model are presented in [10][11], where the flow is treated as turbulent and compressible considering the radial pressure gradient. The model agrees well with the experimental data in the low and medium ranges of rotational speed but differs at high speeds.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 65%
“…Simulations are done for the same three gap sizes. The rotational speed of 17,500 rev/min was assumed, which is in the range of optimal values of the Tesla turbine studied by Rusin et al (2018). Both smooth and rough surfaces are considered, and the roughness equal to 3.5% of the gap size was assumed as in the previous cases.…”
Section: Gap Sizes Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In these regions, flow velocity and turbulence quantities vary abruptly in a nonlinear way from zero on the wall surface (as imposed by the no-slip condition) to their respective equilibrium freestream values, far away from the wall (Farzaneh-Gord et al , 2018). The performance of some systems depends on the velocity profile of the flow close to the wall and wall shear stress arising from fluid viscosity and turbulence, which play a very important role in this regard (Azimy and Saffarian, 2023; Rusin et al , 2018; Schosser et al , 2014). Concerning the near wall region, two ways are usually recommended in Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) approach.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mesh independence study is presented in details in a paper by Rusin et al (2018a). That study put emphasis on the boundary layer discretization as well as the time discretization.…”
Section: Numerical Model and Boundary Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%