2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2015.09.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The evaluation of palatal bone thickness for implant insertion with cone beam computed tomography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
12
1
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
12
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, the success rate did not differ by sex. Sumer et al (15) reported that palatal bone thickness, including that of cancellous bone, did not significantly differ between sexes. Moreover, Farnsworth et al (30) reported that palatal CBT did not differ between males and females.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, the success rate did not differ by sex. Sumer et al (15) reported that palatal bone thickness, including that of cancellous bone, did not significantly differ between sexes. Moreover, Farnsworth et al (30) reported that palatal CBT did not differ between males and females.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Cortical bone quality and quantity are important factors in the primary stability of mini-screws, as such stability is achieved by mechanical retention rather than osseointegration (13)(14)(15). Nienkemper et al (16) found that orthodontic mini-screw stability depended mainly on mechanical maintenance, which should increase with insertion depth, because of the larger bone-to-implant contact area.…”
Section: Risk Factors For Failure Of Orthodontic Mini-screws Placed Imentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, other studies have argued that dental CBCT is suitable for measuring cortical bone thickness. For example, Sumer et al concluded that CBCT is a suitable method for measuring the palatal cortical bone thickness at the implant site, and also argued that the feasibility of measuring the cortical bone thickness is determined by the image resolution rather than through methods such as conventional CT or dental CBCT. Tsutsumi et al stated that if the thickness of the measured cortical bone exceeds the voxel resolution of CBCT from threefold to fourfold, then CBCT would be suitable for measuring cortical bone thickness.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10 With the advent of 3D CBCT, the analysis of bone quality and quantity has greatly improved because it had low patient exposure as compared with computed tomography (CT) scan with high resolution. 11 A study conducted by Sumer et al 12 revealed that CBCT is the choice of diagnostic modality for measurement of palatal bone thickness at implant sites. Miyamoto et al 13 in their study used CT scan for analysis with a resolution of 400 μm, whereas in our study, the CBCT scans had a resolution of 100 μm.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%