PsycEXTRA Dataset 2004
DOI: 10.1037/e620432007-001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Evaluation of the Transforming the School Workforce Pathfinder Project

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
26
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…3 It was intended that the learning from the TSW Pathfinder schools would be used to support a national roll out from January 2004, but in the event, the National Agreement was signed and remodelling began before the end of the Project and the publication of the TSW Project evaluation findings. The detail of the evaluation can be found in the final report (Thomas et al, 2004) where the outcomes regarding the link between interventions into practice and changes in workload are analysed. All teachers and support staff in the 32 schools (4 special, 16 primary, 12 secondary) were asked to complete a substantial questionnaire at the beginning and end of the Project.…”
Section: Transforming the School Workforce Pathfinder Evaluation Projectmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 It was intended that the learning from the TSW Pathfinder schools would be used to support a national roll out from January 2004, but in the event, the National Agreement was signed and remodelling began before the end of the Project and the publication of the TSW Project evaluation findings. The detail of the evaluation can be found in the final report (Thomas et al, 2004) where the outcomes regarding the link between interventions into practice and changes in workload are analysed. All teachers and support staff in the 32 schools (4 special, 16 primary, 12 secondary) were asked to complete a substantial questionnaire at the beginning and end of the Project.…”
Section: Transforming the School Workforce Pathfinder Evaluation Projectmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These produced 4 A full account of the methodology and methods is in Thomas et al (2004) and Butt and Gunter (2005). 5 For the purposes of analysis and reporting (1) teaching staff were categorised as, Senior Managers: Headteacher and Deputies; Middle Managers: heads of subject/curriculum area and student services; teachers: those who are primarily classroom teachers; (2) support staff were categorised as: Support Staff 1: teaching and in class support assistants for teachers and/or individual children; Support Staff 2: technical support, e.g.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The evaluation of this Project (Thomas et al, 2004b) provided a 'unique opportunity to witness intensive change in a sample of schools, and to begin to understand what it means to embrace and experience what became known as remodelling' (Gunter 2004: 2). One of the key 2.…”
Section: Exploring Workforce Remodellingmentioning
confidence: 99%