The Everyday and the Evental Public Space: Rethinking the Spatiotemporal Modalities of Radical Political Events

Abstract

In this paper, we put forward an examination of the interconnections between public space, the everyday, and the event in order to rethink the spatiotemporal modalities of political action. Recent mass mobilisations and civil unrest events around the globe have brought to the fore the complex relationship between political practices and public space. These indicate a critique of representative democracy, authoritarian governance, and precarious living conditions, as well as entailing new ways of doing and conceptualising politics. Our paper approaches the production and (re)configuration of public space through a spatiotemporal analysis of collective action based on the events that took place in Athens, in December 2008, and in Tottenham, London, in August 2011. By considering the everyday socio-political dynamics of public space as formative of radical political practices, we also pay attention to its evental (re) production. Such a process, we argue, entails the potentiality for rupture, contestation and radical imagination.

Resisting extractivism as a feminist critical socio‐spatial practice

“…Such struggles could defy capitalist (binary) enclosures and create new socio‐spatial arrangements for organizing resistance (Fotaki & Daskalaki, 2021, p. 20). The proposed theorizing enables us to think of the emergence of assemblages that engendered “everyday spatiotemporal configuration of events,” political practices, where the concrete meets the elusive (Kallianos & Fumanti, 2021, p. 1106; see also Highmore, 2002, p. 5). On the other hand, it offers the ethical and political possibility to highlight social organizing processes whereby communities strive to reproduce their commons and resource systems by recognizing their actual embodied connection to one another, to all forms of life and the environment (Mandalaki & Fotaki, 2020).…”

“…However, the label “environmental” employed in much of this work needs to be revised: Social movements directly linked to independence struggles, anti‐corruption, and political reform (Haynes, 1999), challenge ecocentric environmentalism in the developed world. For instance, in the “environmentalism of the poor,” the grassroots resistance movements (e.g., the La Via Compesina ) emerge from embodied experiences of the everyday (Guha, 2002; see also, Kallianos & Fumanti, 2021), often focused more broadly on issues of justice, calling for the democratization of local resources, which crosscuts the environment‐poverty axis (Peet & Watts, 2004). These early approaches also fail to account for the specific social practices that produce, reproduce, and transform different values.…”

An Anthropology of Crosslocations

“…Harvey 2012), or even suggested public space as formative of radical political practices (Kallianos and Fumanti 2021) and a central vision for organising democratic movements against neoliberalism (Springer 2011). In the context of Beirut, scholars have examined the issue of public space in relation to sectarian topographies of space (e.g.…”

Racial Capitalism, Political Reproduction, and the Commons: Insights from Migrant Solidarity Politics in Glasgow

“…In a global conjuncture of political enclosure, neoliberalisation, crisis of social reproduction, and exclusionary nationalist discourses on the rise, these contributions are of utmost importance to critical political geography. Indeed, voices in this journal have shown increasing interest on questions of migrant activism and solidarity (Swerts and Nicholls 2021), racial capitalism (Goffe 2023), social reproduction (Kallianos and Fumanti 2021), the tensions between commoning and neoliberalisation (Leap et al 2022), or the racialised dimension of the Covid-19 pandemic (Ye 2021). Yet, while these topics are intrinsically related, there is little conversation happening between all these contributions.…”