2010
DOI: 10.1088/2041-8205/715/2/l99
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Evolution and Eddington Ratio Distribution of Compton Thick Active Galactic Nuclei

Abstract: Previous studies of the active galactic nuclei (AGNs) contribution to the cosmic X-ray background (CXB) consider only observable parameters such as luminosity and absorbing column. Here, for the first time, we extend the study of the CXB to physical parameters including the Eddington ratio of the sources and the black hole mass. In order to calculate the contribution to the CXB of AGN accreting at various Eddington ratios, an evolving Eddington ratio space density model is calculated. In particular, Compton th… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

15
100
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(115 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
15
100
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The model of Gilli et al (2007) is compatible at bright fluxes with the BAT data, but with a steeper slope. On the other hand, there seems to be a constant offset between the BAT log N-logS and the model predictions of Treister et al (2009) and Draper & Ballantyne (2010). The model of Treister et al (2009) reproduces the 14-195 keV BAT log N-log S of Tueller et al (2008) which is in very good agreement with the one published here.…”
Section: Notesupporting
confidence: 87%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The model of Gilli et al (2007) is compatible at bright fluxes with the BAT data, but with a steeper slope. On the other hand, there seems to be a constant offset between the BAT log N-logS and the model predictions of Treister et al (2009) and Draper & Ballantyne (2010). The model of Treister et al (2009) reproduces the 14-195 keV BAT log N-log S of Tueller et al (2008) which is in very good agreement with the one published here.…”
Section: Notesupporting
confidence: 87%
“…6 In order to convert the INTEGRAL data to the BAT band, we took into account that 1 BAT-mCrab in the 17-60 keV band is 1.22 × 10 −11 erg cm (2007) model we use the 10-40 keV predictions available online. 7 Since BAT detects very few Compton-thick AGNs, we limited the predictions of the models of Gilli et al (2007) and Draper & Ballantyne (2010) to objects with log N H 24. The predictions by Treister et al (2009) include objects with log N H 24, however, in their modeling the density of Compton-thick AGNs is (at BAT sensitivities) ∼7% of the total AGN population.…”
Section: Notementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is worth noting that Draper & Ballantyne (2010) have corrected the local space density reported by Treister et al (2009a) to account for the flux-luminosity relation for Comptonthick AGN described by Rigby et al (2009); they found a value in very good agreement with our estimate (∼3.6 × 10 −6 Mpc −3 ).…”
Section: Comparison With Other Samplessupporting
confidence: 86%
“…They also allow exploration of the importance of the CT population, although with different constraining power and different non-negligible degrees of bias-especially at the highest column densities and lowest luminosities (e.g., Burlon et al 2011;Brightman et al 2014;Buchner et al 2015;Lanzuisi et al 2015;Ricci et al 2015). Indeed, the large diversity in the spectral shapes, as well as poorly explored observational parameters in low counting regimes 26 such as the high energy cut-off and the reflection strength at high energies (Treister et al 2009;Ballantyne et al 2011, hereafter BA11), the scattered fractions at low energies (Brightman & Ueda 2012;Lanzuisi et al 2015), or physical parameters such as the Eddington ratio (Draper & Ballantyne 2010), may further introduce uncertainty or biases, enlarging the possible range of the fraction of CT sources to an order of magnitude (Akylas et al 2012) or even significantly reducing their importance (Gandhi et al 2007). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%