2022
DOI: 10.1111/1365-2745.13989
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The evolution, complexity and diversity of models of long‐term forest dynamics

Abstract: This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 131 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2016; Davies-Barnard et al . 2020; Bugmann & Seidl 2022). With the advent of demographic representations in global vegetation and terrestrial carbon cycle models, there is a need for constraining alternative process representations with observations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…2016; Davies-Barnard et al . 2020; Bugmann & Seidl 2022). With the advent of demographic representations in global vegetation and terrestrial carbon cycle models, there is a need for constraining alternative process representations with observations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The G-B relationships and the STL shifts described here are relevant for the C cycle dynamics and the propagation of effects by increased photosynthesis and growth to the scale of a forest stand. How the processes are represented in vegetation models will determine the accuracy of predictions of forest responses under elevated CO2 and other environmental changes (Andresen et al 2016;Davies-Barnard et al 2020;Bugmann & Seidl 2022). With the advent of demographic representations in global vegetation and terrestrial carbon cycle models, there is a need for constraining alternative process representations with observations.…”
Section: Growth Enhancements Lead To Biomass Incrementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Forest models have a long tradition in analysing the impact of climate change on forest structure, species composition and biogeochemical cycles (e.g. [31][32][33][34]). As pointed out by Maréchaux et al [35], forest models are also able to conduct virtual experiments beyond empirical investigations [36][37][38], as well as to test assumptions about ecological processes [39,40].…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Simulation modelling is a powerful tool to quantitatively assess potential future forest trajectories (Thrippleton et al, 2020). Process‐based models that assess the impacts of climate change have matured considerably over the past decades (Bugmann & Seidl, 2022), and are increasingly applied also in the context of restoration management (Kobayashi et al, 2022; Shackelford et al, 2021). One advantage of simulation modelling is that it allows the evaluation of active restoration strategies against the alternative strategy of passive restoration, quantifying long‐term trajectories of ecosystem development with and without restoration measures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Process-based models that assess the impacts of climate change have matured considerably over the past decades (Bugmann & Seidl, 2022), and are increasingly applied also in the context of restoration management (Kobayashi et al, 2022;Shackelford et al, 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%