2022
DOI: 10.1038/s41586-022-04506-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The evolution, evolvability and engineering of gene regulatory DNA

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
295
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 183 publications
(300 citation statements)
references
References 103 publications
5
295
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, although the distribution of mutational effects on expression level has been studied in budding yeast, only limited information is available on the effect of mutations – and especially cis -occurring ones – on protein abundance. Previous studies focused on only a small subset of genes [27, 28], did not differentiate between cis and trans mutations [28, 29], assessed too few mutations [29] or were limited to substitutions occurring within a short segment of the promoter sequence [30]. Thus, instead of arbitrarily choosing a σ mut , we performed simulations across a range of standard deviations, from 0.01 to 0.35, to identify the most biologically plausible value.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similarly, although the distribution of mutational effects on expression level has been studied in budding yeast, only limited information is available on the effect of mutations – and especially cis -occurring ones – on protein abundance. Previous studies focused on only a small subset of genes [27, 28], did not differentiate between cis and trans mutations [28, 29], assessed too few mutations [29] or were limited to substitutions occurring within a short segment of the promoter sequence [30]. Thus, instead of arbitrarily choosing a σ mut , we performed simulations across a range of standard deviations, from 0.01 to 0.35, to identify the most biologically plausible value.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Random mutations may also have asymmetrical effects on expression level, as recently shown for yeast genes [28]. Recent work additionally predicted that mutations increasing expression are rarer for highly expressed promoters – and vice-versa for lowly expressed ones [30]. Various constraints on the effects of mutations can thus create correlations between transcriptional and translational changes or bias evolution, and we hypothesized that some of them might allow our minimal model to generate realistic signed divergence correlations (Fig 1C; Fig 4C).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, disrupting a drug efflux pump can slow the adaptation of E. coli populations exposed to antibiotics by shifting them onto evolutionary paths where some mutations reduce the effect size of key resistance mutations (Lukačišinová et al, 2020). Nevertheless, both theoretical (Kryazhimskiy et al, 2009(Kryazhimskiy et al, , 2014Perfeito et al, 2014;Vaishnav et al, 2022) and smaller-scale studies in bacteria (Chou et al, 2011;Khan et al, 2011;MacLean et al, 2010;Wang et al, 2016), virus (Levy & Siegal, 2008;MacLean et al, 2010;Rokyta et al, 2011), yeast (Kryazhimskiy et al, 2014;Wei & Zhang, 2019) and multicellular fungi (Schoustra et al, 2016) support a strong role of diminishing return epistasis in adaptation. Our findings, precisely tracking the adaptation of a near complete genome-wide deletion collection, underscores that the power and generality of diminishing indeed are immense.…”
Section: Global Diminishing Return Epistasis Dictates Arsenite Adapta...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To improve our fundamental understanding of the impact of codon usage, and in an attempt to improve the predictability of optimal codon usage for protein production, we decided to test different machine learning approaches. Very recently, some studies have successfully utilised machine learning methods to predict gene expression based on randomised sequence libraries for non-coding gene regions, such as promoters and 5’ untranslated regions (5’ UTR) in E. coli and Saccharomyces cerevisiae (16, 17).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%