2020
DOI: 10.1080/10901027.2020.1852346
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The evolution of a child study assignment: a potential approach to developing elementary mathematics teachers’ professional noticing

Abstract: The ability to notice students' mathematical thinking is key to better understanding student learning and effective teaching. Our professional development program utilized a Child Study Assignment in an attempt to strengthen K-3 teacher noticing. We applied principles of improvement science to improve this assignment to better support the development of teachers' noticing skills. In this article, we first describe the Child Study Assignment and adjustments made to the assignment across time. Next, we provide s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 36 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Most of these studies were intervention studies that explore how a particular intervention helped pre-service and in-service teachers improve their strategic noticing skills. Interventions may include any of the following: a) Training as instruction modules (Krupa, Huey, Lesseig, Casey, & Monson, 2017;Fisher, Thomas, Schack, Jong, & Tassell, 2018;Smith, Beattie, Ren, & Heaton, 2020), b) Clinical interviews (van den Kieboom, Magiera, & Moyer, 2017;Shin, 2021), c) Coding transcripts (Scherrer & Stein, 2013;Mitchell & Marin, 2015), and d) Formative intervention (Tunney & van Es, 2016).…”
Section: Preservice Teachers' Interpretations Of Student Mathematical Reasoningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of these studies were intervention studies that explore how a particular intervention helped pre-service and in-service teachers improve their strategic noticing skills. Interventions may include any of the following: a) Training as instruction modules (Krupa, Huey, Lesseig, Casey, & Monson, 2017;Fisher, Thomas, Schack, Jong, & Tassell, 2018;Smith, Beattie, Ren, & Heaton, 2020), b) Clinical interviews (van den Kieboom, Magiera, & Moyer, 2017;Shin, 2021), c) Coding transcripts (Scherrer & Stein, 2013;Mitchell & Marin, 2015), and d) Formative intervention (Tunney & van Es, 2016).…”
Section: Preservice Teachers' Interpretations Of Student Mathematical Reasoningmentioning
confidence: 99%