2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2006.04.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The evolution of a model: A review of Thurstonian and conditional stimulus effects on difference testing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
57
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 97 publications
0
57
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, these were the only sequences that they used, so bad sequences do not explain the differences between the present study and that of Rousseau et al The two studies used different stimuli. It may be hypothesized that judges would be more familiar with changes due to sugar concentration in orange flavored drinks than with the various taste changes due to NaCl concentration in saline solutions (Lee & O'Mahony, 2007a). Further it may be hypothesized that the above response bias would be less effective with more familiar stimuli.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, these were the only sequences that they used, so bad sequences do not explain the differences between the present study and that of Rousseau et al The two studies used different stimuli. It may be hypothesized that judges would be more familiar with changes due to sugar concentration in orange flavored drinks than with the various taste changes due to NaCl concentration in saline solutions (Lee & O'Mahony, 2007a). Further it may be hypothesized that the above response bias would be less effective with more familiar stimuli.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This has been described by the Sequential Sensitivity Analysis (SSA) model (Lee & O'Mahony, 2007a;O'Mahony & Odbert, 1985) as well as conditional stimulus model (Ennis & O'Mahony, 1995). The SSA model predicts for a distilled water/low concentration NaCl system that a duo-trio with a weaker (water) reference (S-odd) would give superior performance to one with a stronger (NaCl) reference (W-odd) (O'Mahony & Odbert, 1985).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second reason was that for the 2-AFCR tests to be performed in a stable manner, it was considered to be important for subjects to have a stable memory of the sensory perception of the reference. Yet, it is well known that each momentary perception of the reference is not exactly same all the time (Lee & O'Mahony, 2007;Macmillan & Creelman, 2005). Thus in order to reduce the perceptual variance within the reference product, it was thought that it was more appropriate to introduce the reference twice before the 2-AFCR task.…”
Section: Familiarization Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Used in Signal Detection Theory and Thurstonian modeling, d 0 estimates are a sensitivity index (Lee & O'Mahony, 2007;Macmillan & Creelman, 2005). In recent studies, d 0 estimate comparisons from various types of difference test designs have been employed using the same subjects and stimuli to determine the most sensitive sensory difference test design .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In signal detection theory and Thurstonian modeling context (Lee & O'Mahony, 2004, 2007, one index that reflects the true sensory difference between stimuli is d 0 . For the comparisons across the various versions of the duo-trio, when the same cognitive decision process can be assumed, this d 0 can also be used as an index for test performance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%