Evolutionary Forensic Psychology 2008
DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195325188.003.0012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Evolution of a Sense of Justice

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
2
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The second relates to agreements between humanspromises, commitments, and other types of social contracts (commutative justice), while the final form of justice concerns correcting mistakes (corrective justice). It includes ideas like forgiveness and the Rs-revenge, reparation, restitution, and retribution (Krebs, 2008). Humans are more than short-term, calculative, and selfinterested creatures; they are ethical-moral beings, naturally capable of subjecting themselves to laws and legal institutions that are just under commutative and distributive justice (Nijman, 2019).…”
Section: Results and Discussion Integration Between The Ratio Of Just...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second relates to agreements between humanspromises, commitments, and other types of social contracts (commutative justice), while the final form of justice concerns correcting mistakes (corrective justice). It includes ideas like forgiveness and the Rs-revenge, reparation, restitution, and retribution (Krebs, 2008). Humans are more than short-term, calculative, and selfinterested creatures; they are ethical-moral beings, naturally capable of subjecting themselves to laws and legal institutions that are just under commutative and distributive justice (Nijman, 2019).…”
Section: Results and Discussion Integration Between The Ratio Of Just...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 should fi t under this simple conceptualization. For example, nature should have selected against individuals who did not respond with moral outrage and anger when group leaders refused them a say in group decisions (voice) or had vested interests in the decisions introduced (impartiality) (for similar naturalistic conceptualizations of distributive fairness, see Binmore, 2011 ;Krebs, 2008 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Проблема заключается в том, что достаточное количество информации у врача (принципала) само по себе не является достаточным основанием для эффективного воздействия: намного важнее обеспечить понимание этой информации пациентом (получателем, агентом) и установить доверительные отношения. Профессор Университета Саймона Фрезера Krebs D предполагает, что сотрудничество тесно связано с доверием, где представляет своего рода перестраховку от "мошенников" [6]. В группах с неразборчивым сотрудничеством создавались бы благоприятные условия для паразитизма эгоистов на альтруистах, что ухудшало бы общую конкурентность и выживаемость группы.…”
Section: кооперация и довериеunclassified