2020 IEEE International Conference on Software Architecture (ICSA) 2020
DOI: 10.1109/icsa47634.2020.00015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Evolution of Architectural Decision Making as a Key Focus Area of Software Architecture Research: A Semi-Systematic Literature Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 185 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The semi-systematic literature review is undertaken using a topical approach, and 66 research publications most recent from various repositories have been selected and examined in connection to the relevant variables with the goal of designing a conceptual framework based on theoretical underpinning. The semi-systematic literature review overcomes the hurdles of a systematic review and synthesizes the vital notions, theories, frameworks, and developments (Snyder, 2019;Bhat et al, 2020). An extensive literature analysis identified a nexus of Employer Branding, which is difficult to understand without its deconstruction; thus, the following paragraphs discuss relationship-based disintegration, which aids in understanding the framework's overall image.…”
Section: Discussion For Final Conceptual Framework the Proposed Frame...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The semi-systematic literature review is undertaken using a topical approach, and 66 research publications most recent from various repositories have been selected and examined in connection to the relevant variables with the goal of designing a conceptual framework based on theoretical underpinning. The semi-systematic literature review overcomes the hurdles of a systematic review and synthesizes the vital notions, theories, frameworks, and developments (Snyder, 2019;Bhat et al, 2020). An extensive literature analysis identified a nexus of Employer Branding, which is difficult to understand without its deconstruction; thus, the following paragraphs discuss relationship-based disintegration, which aids in understanding the framework's overall image.…”
Section: Discussion For Final Conceptual Framework the Proposed Frame...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reviewdriven findings are segregated based on their themes and sub-themes; followed by clubbing of related themes to form more abstract themes for increasing parsimony of conceptual framework. The semi-systematic literature review overcomes the hurdles of a systematic review and synthesizes the vital notions, theories, frameworks, and developments (Snyder, 2019;Bhat et al, 2020). An extensive literature analysis identified a nexus of Employer Branding, which is difficult to understand without its deconstruction; thus, the following paragraphs discuss relationship-based disintegration, which aids in understanding the framework's overall image.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The emerging problem was the computational complexity of the possible state space explosion of the architecture description’s finite-state model. This problem persuades experienced-based analysis methods such as ABAS to not use an analysis tool to evaluate performance [ 99 ].…”
Section: Targeted Quality Attributes: Performance and Security In Sof...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various works ([11, 27, 28, 44, 45] have unearthed the "actual" DM processes as opposed to the "advertised" ones in projects with a mixed governance approach (i.e., consensus-based with dictatorship) with varied levels of detail. However, the focus of most of these works has been on decisions themselves (e.g., [46]), and not on "how" they are made [47,48]. Thus, the influence of OSS participants on how design decisions are made remains underexplored, which leads to our final research question: RQ 4: How do members from various Python roles influence PEP decision-making and does it change when someone other than the BDFL makes the decisions?…”
Section: Background and Research Questionsmentioning
confidence: 99%