2009
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637x/709/1/218
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Evolution of Central Group Galaxies in Hydrodynamical Simulations

Abstract: We trace the evolution of central galaxies in three 1013 M sun galaxy groups simulated at high resolution in cosmological hydrodynamical simulations. In all three cases, the evolution in the group potential leads, at z = 0, to central galaxies that are massive, gas-poor early-type systems supported by stellar velocity dispersion and which resemble either elliptical or S0 galaxies. Their z 2-2.5 main progenitors are massive (M * (3-10) × 1010 M sun), star-forming (20-60 M sun yr-1) galaxies which host substanti… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

14
135
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 106 publications
(149 citation statements)
references
References 118 publications
(170 reference statements)
14
135
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The most popular mechanism has been size increase through minor merging (e.g., Hopkins et al 2009;Feldmann et al 2010;Cimatti et al 2012). This latter scenario for the growth of the median size of Q-ETGs requires however about 10 mergers with about 1:10 mass ratios to explain the observed size growth since z ∼ 2 (e.g., van de Sande et al 2013, and references therein).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most popular mechanism has been size increase through minor merging (e.g., Hopkins et al 2009;Feldmann et al 2010;Cimatti et al 2012). This latter scenario for the growth of the median size of Q-ETGs requires however about 10 mergers with about 1:10 mass ratios to explain the observed size growth since z ∼ 2 (e.g., van de Sande et al 2013, and references therein).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is true in the SAM, as evidenced by Figure 10. Evidence for the importance of mergers in growing stellar mass comes from studies of cosmological and N-body simulations (Naab et al 2009;Oser et al 2010;Feldmann et al 2010;Lackner et al 2012). Additionally, the tidal tails and streams seen in deep imaging of local massive quiescent galaxies support the picture of mass growth via mergers (van Dokkum 2005;Tal et al 2009;Janowiecki et al 2010).…”
Section: Mass Growth Of Quiescent Galaxiesmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…This could be potentially important as gas-poor mergers are known to trigger intense size growth of local early type galaxies (e.g. Naab et al 2007;Feldmann et al 2010), whereas accretion of gas (by gas-rich mergers or smooth accretion) is thought not to be able to since their gas shocks radiatively and loses angular momentum, therefore piling up in the central region of the galaxy where it rapidly turns into stars and causes size contraction. The right panel of Fig.…”
Section: Growth Of Galaxy Sizesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, semi-analytical models and numerical simulations propose that mergers can account for the size increase of local early-type galaxies if they are mostly dry (gas poor) and minor mergers (Boylan-Kolchin et al 2006;Khochfar & Silk 2006;Maller et al 2006;Naab et al , 2007Bournaud et al 2007;De Lucia 2007;Guo & White 2008;Hopkins et al 2009;Nipoti et al 2009;Feldmann et al 2010;Shankar et al 2013;Bédorf & Portegies Zwart 2013). Dry minor mergers explain the loss of compactness of massive ellipticals at z < 2, where they are thought to take over smooth accretion processes in terms of stellar mass increase rates (Oser et al 2010;Lackner et al 2012;Hirschmann et al 2012;Dubois et al 2013;Lee & Yi 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%