2017 IEEE/ACM 39th International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE) 2017
DOI: 10.1109/icse.2017.76
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Evolution of Continuous Experimentation in Software Product Development: From Data to a Data-Driven Organization at Scale

Abstract: Abstract-Software development companies are increasingly aiming to become data-driven by trying to continuously experiment with the products used by their customers. Although familiar with the competitive edge that the A/B testing technology delivers, they seldom succeed in evolving and adopting the methodology. In this paper, and based on an exhaustive and collaborative case study research in a large software-intense company with highly developed experimentation culture, we present the evolution process of mo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
96
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 114 publications
(97 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
96
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the first phase, the first two authors of this paper conducted an in‐depth single case study at Microsoft. The outcome of the first phase was the Experimentation Evolution Model . The second phase of this research consisted of a follow‐up multiple case study, where we worked with Microsoft and with representatives from three additional large‐scale online software companies to further detail and generalize our initial findings from phase 1.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the first phase, the first two authors of this paper conducted an in‐depth single case study at Microsoft. The outcome of the first phase was the Experimentation Evolution Model . The second phase of this research consisted of a follow‐up multiple case study, where we worked with Microsoft and with representatives from three additional large‐scale online software companies to further detail and generalize our initial findings from phase 1.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Systematically conducting trustworthy experiments at large‐scale requires a transformation that is far from intuitive. Conducting many OCEs annually requires technical capabilities that need to be developed, organizational changes that ingrain experimentation with companies' culture and practices, and alignments of business objectives with experiment metrics . The main research question that we strive to answer in this work is “how do large‐scale online software companies grow their experimentation capabilities?” The main contribution of this paper, and the answer to our research question, is The Experimentation Growth Model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The core ingredients for all these types of experiments are the same. Once the responsible developer or analyst decides to launch an experiment, they need to have an understanding of (1) what to measure, i.e., the overall evaluation criterion (OEC) [16], [9], (2) how many data points to collect for being able to statistically reason about the OEC and thus the experiment's outcome (i.e., sample size), (3) which users to conduct the experiment on (e.g., different user groups, regions), and (4) when to run the experiment.…”
Section: B Ingredients Of Experimentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, setting up such an experimentation infrastructure is not a straightforward task, as demonstrated by experience reports of, e.g., Kevic et al [1], Xu et al [8], and Fabijan et al [9]. An essential requirement for successful experimentation is to collect enough data to draw valid statistical conclusions (cf.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Those include reports of Microsoft [10,11] and Google [20]. Similarly, Fabijan et al [5] derived a model detailing technical, organizational, and business evolution to provide a guidance towards data-driven experimentation based on an investigation of the evolution of the experimentation process at Microsoft.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%