2017
DOI: 10.1111/ede.12246
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The evolution of floral ontogenetic allometry in the Andean genus Caiophora (Loasaceae, subfam. Loasoideae)

Abstract: The astounding variety of angiosperm flower morphologies has evolved in response to many selective forces. Flower development is highly coordinated and involves developmental associations between size and shape, ontogenetic allometry, which in turn affect the morphology of mature flowers. Although ontogenetic allometries can act as a developmental constraint and may influence adaptive evolution, allometries can evolve themselves and may change rapidly in response to selection. We explored the evolution of onto… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
(121 reference statements)
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By using regression analysis of the Procrustes coordinates and centroid size/log-transformed centroid size, the association between shape and size across different age groups was significant with moderate to high effect. This allometric effect has been reported in other organisms and the relationships vary and were usually high during ontogenesis (Rocha et al 2005;Scalici et al 2010;Strelin et al 2018). However, for future studies, we recommend using an equal amount of sample size between groups and to reassess the GM landmarks.…”
Section: Tablesupporting
confidence: 56%
“…By using regression analysis of the Procrustes coordinates and centroid size/log-transformed centroid size, the association between shape and size across different age groups was significant with moderate to high effect. This allometric effect has been reported in other organisms and the relationships vary and were usually high during ontogenesis (Rocha et al 2005;Scalici et al 2010;Strelin et al 2018). However, for future studies, we recommend using an equal amount of sample size between groups and to reassess the GM landmarks.…”
Section: Tablesupporting
confidence: 56%
“…The vectors of coefficients of these regressions represent the multivariate ‘broad‐sense’ form of static allometry for each sex and species, respectively. These allometric vectors (A) were then used to compute allometric spaces using ordination of allometric vectors to illustrate variation in allometric scaling (Gerber, Eble, & Neige, 2008; Gerber & Hopkins, 2011; Strelin, Benitez‐Vieyra, Fornoni, Klingenberg, & Cocucci, 2018). To this end, I used the R‐function prcomp() based on the covariance matrix of all static allometric vectors.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This construction has been referred to as ‘phylomorphospace’ (Sidlauskas ; but see Strelin et al . for a warning regarding the use of this term). It has been used to infer the placement of ‘ancestors’ in the morphospace, assess the strength of the phylogenetic signal contained in a morphological dataset, and test for patterns of convergence (e.g.…”
Section: Phylomorphospacementioning
confidence: 99%