2000
DOI: 10.1023/a:1011063625087
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The evolution of generation time in metapopulations of monocarpic perennial plants: some theoretical considerations and the example of the rare thistle Carlina vulgaris

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
25
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Overwinter seed predation on the ground may be high; in one study more than 60% of seeds were consumed by small mammals (Greig-Smith and Sagar 1981). Seeds germinate from April to June, and there is little evidence of a persistent seed bank (Eriksson and Eriksson 1997;de Jong et al 2000).…”
Section: The Biology Of Carlina Vulgarismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Overwinter seed predation on the ground may be high; in one study more than 60% of seeds were consumed by small mammals (Greig-Smith and Sagar 1981). Seeds germinate from April to June, and there is little evidence of a persistent seed bank (Eriksson and Eriksson 1997;de Jong et al 2000).…”
Section: The Biology Of Carlina Vulgarismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the constant environment model, the flowering strategy should not have an age dependent component as neither growth nor mortality are age- dependent; this is indeed what we observe in the individualbased simulation. In the random environment things are more complicated, and we believe there are at least three possible reasons why flowering might have an age-dependent component: (1) the population may persist within a metapopulation and de Jong et al (2000) have shown that in such a setting there is selection for early flowering, which allows individuals to rapidly exploit new areas after initial colonization; (2) there is substantial temporal variation in mortality, which makes delaying reproduction for long periods of time very risky; age-dependent flowering would reduce the chance that individuals are exposed to a year when mortality is high; this interpretation is supported by recent theoretical work (Benton and Grant 1999); and (3) age-dependence provides an additional way to control flowering, which might allow fine-tuning of the flowering strategy; this is related to point (2) and is supported by subjective field observations (P. Grubb, pers. obs.…”
Section: Age-dependent Floweringmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Several studies have attempted to predict the optimal size of flowering in semelparous plants, using a variety of approaches. These approaches include analytical approximations, dynamic state variable models or computationally expensive individual-based models (Kachi & Hirose 1985;de Jong et al 1989de Jong et al , 2000Wesselingh et al 1997;Rees et al 1999Rees et al , 2000Rose et al 2002). Rees et al (1999) compared these different approaches by developing a series of parameterized demographic models of the monocarpic thistle Onopordum illyricum and found that an accurate prediction of flowering size was possible only when using an individual-based model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most were designed to show that delayed owering is adaptive. Others attempted to predict the optimal size and age at owering, with variable levels of success (Kachi & Hirose 1985;de Jong et al 1989de Jong et al , 2000Wesselingh et al 1997;Rees et al 1999Rees et al , 2000. The calculation of the evolutionarily stable strategy (ESS) or optimal strategy is complicated because there is substantial variation between individual growth, which means that simple optimization approaches, such as the 1 year look-ahead approach introduced by Rees et al (2000), only yield approximate solutions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%