2003
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2583.2003.00417.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The evolution of HOM‐C homeoboxes in the Dipteran family Drosophilidae

Abstract: Forty-five new Homeotic Complex (HOM-C) homeobox sequences from six species of Drosophilidae (Drosophila heteroneura, D. adiastola, Zaprionus vittiger, Chymomyza amoena, Scaptodrosophila pattersoni and Hirtodrosophila pictiventris) were obtained using a PCR-cloning method. These new homeoboxes are from the labial, proboscipedia, Deformed, Sex combs reduced, fushi tarazu, Antennapedia, Ultrabithorax, abdominal-A and Abdominal-B genes. Phylogenetic signal in the homeobox sequences was assessed and several aspect… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 21 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The integration of evolution and genomics has been advocated for many years as a fruitful and convenient feedback relationship (Eisen 1998; Eisen and Wu 2002; Mitchell-Olds and Clauss 2002; DeSalle et al 2003). Phylogenomics, originally defined as a combination of phylogenetic tree construction, integration of experimental data and differentiation between orthologs and paralogs, has been proposed to improve predictions of gene function (Eisen 1998; Eisen and Fraser 2003; Sjölander 2004; Brown and Sjolander 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The integration of evolution and genomics has been advocated for many years as a fruitful and convenient feedback relationship (Eisen 1998; Eisen and Wu 2002; Mitchell-Olds and Clauss 2002; DeSalle et al 2003). Phylogenomics, originally defined as a combination of phylogenetic tree construction, integration of experimental data and differentiation between orthologs and paralogs, has been proposed to improve predictions of gene function (Eisen 1998; Eisen and Fraser 2003; Sjölander 2004; Brown and Sjolander 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%