2008
DOI: 10.1080/13523270802003111
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Evolution of Human Rights Thinking in North Korea

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As mentioned earlier, for frame resonance to activate effectively, human rights norms need to be internally coherent and fit with a broader socio-political culture in North Korea. Even though North Korea introduced the term "human rights" into its Constitution in 2009, it has prioritized cultural relativism over universalism, collective interests over individual interests, socio-economic rights over civil and political rights, and duties before rights (Weatherley and Song 2008). The concept of human rights has been used within the unique cultural, political and ideological context of North Korea.…”
Section: Prospects Of Self-organizing Dynamics In North Koreamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As mentioned earlier, for frame resonance to activate effectively, human rights norms need to be internally coherent and fit with a broader socio-political culture in North Korea. Even though North Korea introduced the term "human rights" into its Constitution in 2009, it has prioritized cultural relativism over universalism, collective interests over individual interests, socio-economic rights over civil and political rights, and duties before rights (Weatherley and Song 2008). The concept of human rights has been used within the unique cultural, political and ideological context of North Korea.…”
Section: Prospects Of Self-organizing Dynamics In North Koreamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The inclusion of human rights language is not about civil and political rights but a consistent political statement about collective interests (Cho 2018). Built upon historical layers of Confucian, Marxist, and juche philosophies, the North Korean conception of human rights lies in the duty-based contexts of the familial, the collective, and the sovereign (Weatherley and Song 2008;Song 2009). Its socialist conception of human rights emphasizes national independence from colonial and imperialist powers, claims aligned socialist interests of the working masses, and eschews the weaponized talk of human rights by the United States-the last point being that its people will never have human rights while under the threat of war.…”
Section: Citizen's Rights and Dutiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In mid‐September 2014, North Korea's DPRK Association for Human Rights Studies (most likely under the control of the Korean Workers Party) published a lengthy report (DPRK HR Report) that Hawk describes as revealing ‘a great deal about how a powerful governing organ of the North Korean state sees itself and the world’ (Hawk , p. 221). In line with Song and Weatherly's analysis of North Korean human rights discourse pre‐COI, the report defines three key features of the North Korean interpretation of human rights: (i) human rights are conditional and shaped by ‘the demand and reality of the nation‐state’, (ii) collective rights are above individual rights—‘the right of the individual apart from the social collective is unthinkable’, and (iii) welfare and subsistence rights have special importance (Weatherley & Song , p. 273; see also Fahy ). The argument is then bolstered by a thorough, but somewhat contradictory, accounting of North Korea's participation in the international instruments and mechanisms to which it has made commitments, and its efforts to adopt or amend local laws in accordance with these commitments (DPRK HR Report, pp.…”
Section: The North Korean Counter Offensivementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This article comes alongside several key studies undertaken both pre‐ and post‐COI, which analyse the North Korean response to international pressure over human rights (Chow ; Fahy ; Goedde ; Song ; Weatherley & Song ). Referencing models of human rights norm adoption, these studies concur that North Korea has made changes as a result of criticism (Fahy ) as part of efforts to ‘boost its international image’ (Chow , p. 147) and argue that this positions North Korea somewhere along a trajectory towards normative improvement.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%