2013
DOI: 10.1080/08912963.2013.777533
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The evolution of jaw mechanism and dental function in heterodont crocodyliforms

Abstract: Heterodont dentition sometimes including multicuspid crowns appeared in numerous fossil forms through all main lineages of the Crocodyliformes. Teeth in these complex dentitions frequently bear wear facets that are exclusive indicators of tooth-tooth occlusion. Besides dental features, specializations of the jaw apparatus, jaw adductors and mandibular movement can be recognized, all reflecting a high variability of jaw mechanism and of intraoral food

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
91
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(92 citation statements)
references
References 159 publications
(371 reference statements)
0
91
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…longirostrine animals compensate the higher pressure from dragging with narrower snouts; McHenry et al ., 2006; Walmsley et al ., 2013). Similarly, other regions of the crocodylomorph skull that vary significantly also have important implications for biomechanics and feeding strategies, such as the changes in quadrate condyle width, which are presumably associated with the craniomandibular joint (Kley et al ., 2010; Stubbs et al ., 2013; Ősi, 2014), even though relatively less variation is observed in these regions when compared to the snout.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…longirostrine animals compensate the higher pressure from dragging with narrower snouts; McHenry et al ., 2006; Walmsley et al ., 2013). Similarly, other regions of the crocodylomorph skull that vary significantly also have important implications for biomechanics and feeding strategies, such as the changes in quadrate condyle width, which are presumably associated with the craniomandibular joint (Kley et al ., 2010; Stubbs et al ., 2013; Ősi, 2014), even though relatively less variation is observed in these regions when compared to the snout.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Additionally, many crocodylians (e.g., Alligator mississippiensis , Caiman crocodilus , Crocodylus moreletii , Osteolaemus tetraspis , Paleosuchus trigonatus ) have mixed diets (McNease and Joanen, ; Delany and Abercrombie, ; Tucker et al, ; Pauwels et al, ; Pauwels et al, ; Saalfeld et al, ; Laverty and Dobson, ), and this may be reflected in their somewhat high complexity, 5.23–6.8 PPT at 25 RPT. That being said, crocodylian tooth morphology also is, in part, controlled by the ability to resist extremely high bite forces (Erickson et al, ; Ősi, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alligators have relatively generalist diets among crocodylians (Brochu, ). Though there is some diversity in extant crocodylian feeding, the trophic diversity of extinct crocodyliforms is far greater (Case, ; Brochu, ; Turner & Sertich, ; Ősi, ). To begin to understand the relationship of enamel thickness and diet, we also measured enamel thickness in the caudal, relatively blunt molariforms of select extinct crocodyliforms with derived dental morphologies and presumed diets: an unnamed protosuchid (UCMP 97638), Iharkutosuchus (MTM VER 2018.837) and Allognathosuchus (YPM‐PU 16989).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…UCMP 97638 is a protosuchian from the Jurassic of North America. Its bicuspid teeth had wear patterns that suggest active oral processing (Ősi, ). Ih arkutosuchus is a stem eusuchian from the Cretaceous of Europe (Ősi et al , ) and has complex, multi‐cusped teeth reminiscent of mammalian dentition (Ősi & Weishampel, ) that are thought to engage in oral processing of plant matter.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%