2013
DOI: 10.1080/03637751.2013.788252
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Evolution of Organizational Archetypes: From the American to the Entrepreneurial Dream

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
26
0
4

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
1
26
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Much current scholarly literature and popular discourse present entrepreneurial employment as empowering. Such presentations accord with longstanding popular American perceptions of the entrepreneur as a positive archetype, worthy of emulation and central to capitalism's capacity for economic growth (Gill, 2013).…”
Section: Entrepreneurial Career Typesupporting
confidence: 58%
“…Much current scholarly literature and popular discourse present entrepreneurial employment as empowering. Such presentations accord with longstanding popular American perceptions of the entrepreneur as a positive archetype, worthy of emulation and central to capitalism's capacity for economic growth (Gill, 2013).…”
Section: Entrepreneurial Career Typesupporting
confidence: 58%
“…The present research follows this call to further theorize special advisers by applying a career perspective inspired by both the literature on policy professionals (Blach-Ørsten et al 2017b;Garsten et al 2015;Svallfors 2017) and the sociology of work literature (Abbott 1993;Gill 2013;Neff 2012;Neff et al 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A persistent metaphor in studies on special advisers is the need to more constantly shine the bright light of research in their direction: Blick’s (2004) seminal book on special advisers bears the title The People Who Live in the Dark , and in an introduction to a recent special issue on ministerial advisers, Hustedt and Salomonsen (2017: 201) argued for a need to drag ministerial advisers “out of the dark.” That, however, is not the only need Hustedt and Salomonsen (2017) addressed: they also called for a theoretical turn in studies on special advisers, following Shaw and Eichbaum (2015) in an earlier special issue on the subject. The present research follows this call to further theorize special advisers by applying a career perspective inspired by both the literature on policy professionals (Blach-Ørsten et al 2017a; Garsten et al 2015; Svallfors 2016) and the sociology of work literature (Abbott 1993; Gill 2013; Neff 2012; Neff et al 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Scholars have, for example, analyzed media (Achtenhagen and Welter, 2011;Iyer, 2009;Wallis, 2006), business periodicals (Gill, 2013), popular narratives (Smith, 2010;Smith and Anderson, 2004), teaching material (Ahl, 2007b;Jones, 2011) and entrepreneurship research (Ahl, 2004;Bruni et al, 2004). All results point to the male gendering of entrepreneurship and the stereotyping and second-ordering of women.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%