27th European Mask and Lithography Conference 2011
DOI: 10.1117/12.896892
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The evolution of pattern placement metrology for mask making

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The measurement results presented in the last section demonstrate that one-dimensional, traceable registration measurements with reproducibility of 0.2 nm (1σ ) are readily obtainable even with the current setup of the Nanometer Comparator. Mask measurement machines of the actual generator, such as Prove of Zeiss [10] and IPRO 5 of KLA Tencor [24] demonstrated nominal accuracies of 0.17 nm and 0.27 nm (1σ ). Due to their superior microscope optics, both reach these values even if structures as small as 100 nm are measured.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The measurement results presented in the last section demonstrate that one-dimensional, traceable registration measurements with reproducibility of 0.2 nm (1σ ) are readily obtainable even with the current setup of the Nanometer Comparator. Mask measurement machines of the actual generator, such as Prove of Zeiss [10] and IPRO 5 of KLA Tencor [24] demonstrated nominal accuracies of 0.17 nm and 0.27 nm (1σ ). Due to their superior microscope optics, both reach these values even if structures as small as 100 nm are measured.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An analysis of the calibration procedure reveals that a traceable calibration can be obtained in the course of the self-calibration process if the separation of two features has been calibrated traceably. The use of a mask, which has been fully calibrated as referred to [10,11], does not lead to any advantage because possible influences of the mask position and orientation have to be determined as well by a very similar set of measurements as in the self-calibration procedure. Therefore, the PTB decided to discontinue two-dimensional position or registration calibrations of photomasks in the near future and offer only one-dimensional registration calibrations on photomasks by means of the Nanometer Comparator.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%