2005
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361:20053108
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The evolution of planetary nebulae

Abstract: Abstract.A detailed theoretical study of the basic internal kinematics of planetary nebulae is presented, based on 1D radiationhydrodynamics simulations of circumstellar envelopes around central stars of 0.595 and 0.696 M . By means of observable quantities like radial surface-brightness distributions and emission-line profiles computed from the models, a comparison with real objects was performed and revealed a reasonable agreement. This allowed to draw important conclusions by investigating the kinematics of… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

20
87
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(107 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
(62 reference statements)
20
87
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If we take a limiting radius of 0.2 pc for a bright PN (10 arcsec diameter at the distance of the bulge, which is twice the limit of our survey), this corresponds to an expansion age of 10 000 yr for an expansion velocity of 20 km s −1 ) or 5000 yr for 40 km s −1 . The higher value is found in models (Schönberner et al 2005); our data shows about equal numbers of lower and higher velocities, correcting for the outer edge, which expands 1.4 times faster than the mass-averaged velocity derived from the spectra. A PN becomes observable once the central star reaches a temperature of 20 kK and fades when either the nebula becomes optically thin to ionizing radiation or the star begins to fade.…”
Section: Pn Visibilitysupporting
confidence: 40%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…If we take a limiting radius of 0.2 pc for a bright PN (10 arcsec diameter at the distance of the bulge, which is twice the limit of our survey), this corresponds to an expansion age of 10 000 yr for an expansion velocity of 20 km s −1 ) or 5000 yr for 40 km s −1 . The higher value is found in models (Schönberner et al 2005); our data shows about equal numbers of lower and higher velocities, correcting for the outer edge, which expands 1.4 times faster than the mass-averaged velocity derived from the spectra. A PN becomes observable once the central star reaches a temperature of 20 kK and fades when either the nebula becomes optically thin to ionizing radiation or the star begins to fade.…”
Section: Pn Visibilitysupporting
confidence: 40%
“…For A 43, we find 8.5 kyr and for VV 47 13 kyr, using the data of Friederich et al (2011) and Weinberger (1989), respectively. For the last object, we adopt the higher expansion velocity derived from [N ii] rather than lower value from [O iii], as assumed earlier by Schönberner & Napiwotzki (1990) because [N ii] emission better probes the outer shell regions (e.g., Schönberner et al 2005). We do not have a mass-averaged velocity for either object, and the kinematical ages are less certain than for the modelled nebulae.…”
Section: Asteroseismological Massesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A discussion with many results is given by Terzian (1997) and the effect of the ionization front is discussed by Mellema (2004). In addition, Schönberner et al(2005) have made and applied kinematic models of several PNe to obtain expansion distances. There is general agreement for the four PNe common to the results of both Mellema (2004) and Schönberner et al(2005), which indicate some of the expansion distances given by Terzian (1997) should be increased.…”
Section: Pn Distancesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, Schönberner et al(2005) have made and applied kinematic models of several PNe to obtain expansion distances. There is general agreement for the four PNe common to the results of both Mellema (2004) and Schönberner et al(2005), which indicate some of the expansion distances given by Terzian (1997) should be increased. The increases depend on the individual models and are thus uncertain.…”
Section: Pn Distancesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are also a few objects with distances obtained by expansion parallaxes observed by GLIMPSE. However this method also has its limitations, especially concerning the derivation of the nebular expansion velocity (Mellema 2004), and the distances determined by this method may be underestimated by a factor 1.3 ∼ 3 (Schoenberner et al 2005). …”
Section: Estimation Of Errorsmentioning
confidence: 99%