2022
DOI: 10.3390/jcm11061512
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Evolution of Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty—From the First Steps to Novel Implant Designs and Surgical Techniques

Abstract: Purpose of Review: The purpose of this review is to summarize recent literature regarding the latest design modifications and biomechanical evolutions of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty and their impact on postoperative outcomes. Recent findings: Over the past decade, worldwide implantation rates of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty have drastically increased for various shoulder pathologies. While Paul Grammont’s design principles first published in 1985 for reverse total shoulder arthroplasty remained … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 125 publications
(207 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Currently, the implant design for rSTA is founded on the Grammont principle. This principle encompasses four key features: ( 1 ) the medially displaced center of rotation, which reduces humeral tension and increases recruitment of the anterior and posterior deltoid muscles to compensate for rotator cuff deficiency; ( 2 ) a convex weight-bearing component and concave supportive component; ( 3 ) the fixed center of rotation, which is distalized and medialized to the glenoid joint line to establish inherent implant stability; and ( 4 ) a large glenosphere to enhance the ROM via a semi-constrained implant attribute ( 18 , 19 ). However, the implementation of rTSA implant design differs in some implant details to overcome potential postoperative issues reported extensively in the current studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, the implant design for rSTA is founded on the Grammont principle. This principle encompasses four key features: ( 1 ) the medially displaced center of rotation, which reduces humeral tension and increases recruitment of the anterior and posterior deltoid muscles to compensate for rotator cuff deficiency; ( 2 ) a convex weight-bearing component and concave supportive component; ( 3 ) the fixed center of rotation, which is distalized and medialized to the glenoid joint line to establish inherent implant stability; and ( 4 ) a large glenosphere to enhance the ROM via a semi-constrained implant attribute ( 18 , 19 ). However, the implementation of rTSA implant design differs in some implant details to overcome potential postoperative issues reported extensively in the current studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, if superior and posterior screws penetrate the scapular spine, they can act as stress risers and lead to scapular fracture. Therefore, the length and direction of superior and posterior screws should be checked carefully [21][22][23]. An oval-shaped baseplate could be better for fixation, but it can be too large for Asian patients with a relatively smaller-sized glenoid [14,20,24].…”
Section: A a B Bmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the RSA, the center of rotation of the shoulder is displaced inferiorly and medially. This also lengthens the moment arm and increases the deltoid force [ 7 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%