2000
DOI: 10.1146/annurev.astro.38.1.143
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Evolution of Rotating Stars

Abstract: ▪ Abstract  In this article we first review the main physical effects to be considered in the building of evolutionary models of rotating stars on the Upper Main-Sequence (MS). The internal rotation law evolves as a result of contraction and expansion, meridional circulation, diffusion processes, and mass loss. In turn, differential rotation and mixing exert a feedback on circulation and diffusion, so that a consistent treatment is necessary. We review recent results on the evolution of internal rotation and … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

19
871
2
7

Year Published

2001
2001
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 908 publications
(899 citation statements)
references
References 194 publications
19
871
2
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Other formulations of this relation for conservative and nonconservative rotation laws, produce , von Zeipel 1924;Lucy 1967;Smith & Worley 1974;Kippenhahn 1977;Hadrava 1992;Maeder 1999Maeder , 2009Lovekin et al 2006;Gillich et al 2008;Dall & Sbordone 2011;Espinosa Lara & Rieutord 2011;Claret 2012). Moreover, because of the simple fact that β 1 is colatitude θ-dependent, an observed β 1 is necessarily a function of the aspect angle (Domiciano de Souza et al 2014;Rieutord 2016;Zorec et al 2016).…”
Section: The Stoeckley Effectmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Other formulations of this relation for conservative and nonconservative rotation laws, produce , von Zeipel 1924;Lucy 1967;Smith & Worley 1974;Kippenhahn 1977;Hadrava 1992;Maeder 1999Maeder , 2009Lovekin et al 2006;Gillich et al 2008;Dall & Sbordone 2011;Espinosa Lara & Rieutord 2011;Claret 2012). Moreover, because of the simple fact that β 1 is colatitude θ-dependent, an observed β 1 is necessarily a function of the aspect angle (Domiciano de Souza et al 2014;Rieutord 2016;Zorec et al 2016).…”
Section: The Stoeckley Effectmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although in these cases we are not able to detect such motions, we should not conclude that they are not present, regardless of their physical origin. This is particularly valid in Be stars, where atmospheres can undergo significant upheavals maintained by nonradial pulsations, a large spectrum of instabilities induced by the rapid rotation, and possible disordered magnetic fields generated by underphotospheric convection (Clement 1979;Maeder et al 2008;Cantiello et al 2009;Cantiello & Braithwaite 2011).…”
Section: Preliminary Commentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The model rapidly reaches the critical velocity (the so called ΩΓ-limit if one takes into account the radiation pressure effect [29]). The star model loses very little mass during the MS phase, but a lot in the red supergiant phase due to the chemical enrichment and keeping at the ΩΓ-limit.…”
Section: The First Starsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies on stellar evolutions are matured topics [1]. The most of the studies on rotating stellar evolution are, however, based on the slow rotation approximation, which assumes spherical stars.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%