2002
DOI: 10.1071/as02009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Evolution of Shocks in Blazar Jets

Abstract: We consider the shock structures that can arise in blazar jets as a consequence of variations in the jet flow velocity. There are two possible cases: (1) A double shock system consisting of both a forward and reverse shock (2) A single shock (either forward or reverse) together with a rarefaction wave. These possibilities depend upon the relative velocity of the two different sections of jet. Using previously calculated spherical models for estimates of the magnetic field and electron number density of the emi… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The nonthermal emission from BL Lac is usually modeled by the synchrotron self-Compton scenario (SSC, see e.g., Maraschi et al 1992;Bicknell & Wagner 2002), where relativistic electrons cool either via the synchrotron or the inverse Compton mechanism. The comptonized photons are assumed to be predominantly the synchrotron photons themselves, rather than photons coming from the outside the emission region as in the external Compton model (EC, see e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The nonthermal emission from BL Lac is usually modeled by the synchrotron self-Compton scenario (SSC, see e.g., Maraschi et al 1992;Bicknell & Wagner 2002), where relativistic electrons cool either via the synchrotron or the inverse Compton mechanism. The comptonized photons are assumed to be predominantly the synchrotron photons themselves, rather than photons coming from the outside the emission region as in the external Compton model (EC, see e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Structure and dynamics of such internal shocks is in general very complex and depends on a number of parameters, such as the relative velocity of inhomogeneities, their densities, temperatures, geometry, and total masses. The shock structure can be double, single (forward or reverse), or can initially it can be double, followed by an evolution into a single shock (Daigne & Mochkovitch 1998;Bicknell & Wagner 2002). Regardless, in the case of inhomogeneities which are cold prior to their collision and which have comparable masses and comparable rest frame densities, the constant speed of the shocked plasma is a good approximation.…”
Section: The Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent high-resolution observations of AGN jets show fine structure of knots in the beam flow for up to several tens of kiloparsecs in M87 (Biretta et al 1999;Marshall et al 2002;Wilson & Yang 2002), 3C 273 (Bahcall et al 1995;Marshall et al 2001;Sambruna et al 2002;Jester et al 2002), Centaurus A (Kraft et al 2002), 3C 303 (Kataoka et al 2003), and others (Sambruna et al 2001). Knots on subparsec or parsec scales are thought to be from intermittent flows from the central source, and knots in ''blazars'' are due to exceptionally strong shocks that are caused by the collisions of internal shocks (Spada et al 2001;Bicknell & Wagner 2002). Knots on kiloparsec or larger scales are not well understood.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%