2012
DOI: 10.1080/1406099x.2012.10840515
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The evolution of tax and benefit policy in Latvia: what has been the place of distributional considerations?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Concerning the latter, when assuming 100 per cent pass-through into prices, the impact of the rise in VAT was regressive (Zasova et al 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Concerning the latter, when assuming 100 per cent pass-through into prices, the impact of the rise in VAT was regressive (Zasova et al 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 The progressivness was probably due to the ceilings in benefits and cuts in public wages but also child-related benefits. Many of the reforms implemented in Latvia were in fact proposed much earlier and were correcting for policy failures (Zasova et al 2012). International organizations (the IMF and the World Bank) have been arguing for more equitable policies than those applied at the national level.…”
Section: Tax Policiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation