The Evolution of the Internet in Ethiopia and Rwanda: Towards a “Developmental” Model?

Abstract

The Internet in Africa has become an increasingly contested space, where competing ideas of development and society battle for hegemony. By comparing the evolution of the Internet in Ethiopia and Rwanda, we question whether policies and projects emerging from two of Africa's fastest growing, but also most tightly controlled countries, can be understood as part of a relatively cohesive model of the 'developmental' Internet, which challenges mainstream conceptions. Our answer is a qualified yes. Ethiopia and Rwanda have shared an overarching strategy which places the state as the prime mover in the development of Internet policy and large-scale ICT projects. Rwanda, however, appears to have developed a more open model which can accommodate a greater variety of actors and opinions, and incorporate them within a relatively coherent vision that emanates from the centre. Ethiopia, in contrast, has developed a more closed model, where all powers rest firmly in the hands of a government that has refused (so far) to entertain and engage with alternative ideas of the Internet. In the case of Rwanda, we argue, this approach reflects broader strategies adopted by the government in the economic domain but appears to counter the prevailing political approach of the government, allowing for a greater degree of freedom on the Internet as compared to traditional media. While in the case of Ethiopia, the opposite is true; Ethiopia's Internet policies appear to run counter to prevailing economic policies but fit tightly with the government's approach to politics and governance. stability

Assessing the knowledge, attitude and perception on workplace readiness regarding COVID-19 among health care providers in Ethiopia—An internet-based survey

“…This inevitably might have skewed the study results by only including respondents with access to the internet, which in turn, easier access to information. Given the access to internet and medical supplies outside urban Ethiopia has been historically challenging [ 29 – 32 ], we anticipate the actual knowledge level and workplace preparedness would be lower than our study results. Second, our study investigated the perceived workplace readiness.…”

Current status, challenges, and opportunities of e‐Government in Ethiopia: The case of Wachemo University

“…The measures that were taken in the aftermath of this political battle included ambitious projects to reinforce the state. Among these, one was concerning the development of ICT in service delivery (Gagliardone & Golooba‐Mutebi, 2016). Later, during the period of Plan for Accelerated and Sustainable Development to End Poverty (PASDEP), which runs between 2005 and 2010, five major initiatives were designed with regard to the ICT sector development in the PASDEP document (Ministry of Finance and Economic Development, 2005).…”

“…The measures that were taken in the aftermath of this political battle included ambitious projects to reinforce the state. Among these, one was concerning the development of ICT in service delivery (Gagliardone & Golooba-Mutebi, 2016) While the policy objectives were laudable, a critical standpoint shows a conflict between government policy objectives for improving affordable access to ICTs to stakeholders and the regulatory and policy instruments available to enable it (Adam, 2012).…”

The Quandary of Cyber Governance in Ethiopia

“…In Ethiopian case not only monopolization of the sector matters but also the approach of governing cyberspace is exclusively based on combative approach. Ethiopian model of internet governance is closed where all powers on the internet exclusively rests on the hands of the government with no room for engaging and entertaining alternative means of managing the internet [9]. Furthermore, accessibility of information in Ethiopia is very limited.…”

“…Ethiopia has a short history of internet and is one of the lowest interconnected nation in Africa [8]. Absence of wellorganized institutions in expanding the infrastructure, government's restrictive approach and the monopoly of the sector by the government have encumbered to exploit digital benefits and opportunities [9].…”