2022
DOI: 10.14309/crj.0000000000000763
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Evolution of the MELD Score and Its Implications in Liver Transplant Allocation: A Beginner's Guide for Trainees

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Globally, liver transplantation plays a pivotal role in managing end-stage liver disease, ranking second only to kidney transplantation in terms of major organ transplants. In the United States, organ allocation is governed by protocols established by the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS), which rely on scoring systems like MELD [ 11 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Globally, liver transplantation plays a pivotal role in managing end-stage liver disease, ranking second only to kidney transplantation in terms of major organ transplants. In the United States, organ allocation is governed by protocols established by the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS), which rely on scoring systems like MELD [ 11 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For patients whose clinical status transitions from decompensation into end-stage disease, the MELD-Na is a scoring system used to evaluate potential candidates for liver transplantation but has other applications, including predicting mortality in fulminant hepatic failure, alcoholic hepatitis, cirrhosis with infections, variceal bleeding, trauma, and hepatorenal syndrome, among other complications [ 10 ]. The components of the MELD-Na score include serum bilirubin, serum creatinine, international normalized ratio, and serum sodium [ 10 , 11 ]. MELD-Na scores range from six to 40 and higher scores correlate with increased disease severity and priority for organ allocation [ 12 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It estimates the likelihood of a patient surviving their disease over the next three months [ 19 ]. Similarly computed using serum bilirubin, serum creatinine, and INR, the MELD score ranges from six to 40, with higher scores indicating more severe liver disease [ 18 , 20 ]. Patients with higher MELD scores are given higher priority on the transplant waitlist for a deceased donor organ [ 21 ].…”
Section: Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This implementation has led to a reduction of 3.5% in waiting list mortality, a 10.2% increase in deceased donor transplants, and a 12% decrease in patients awaiting transplantation [ 22 ]. Notably, patients with lower MELD scores should still be considered for liver transplantation, as significant living-donor liver transplants can serve as life-saving options for this subset of patients who may otherwise not qualify for transplantation [ 20 ].…”
Section: Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%