1987
DOI: 10.2172/5686483
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The evolution of the minimum degree ordering algorithm

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
102
0
3

Year Published

1993
1993
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(105 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
102
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…For some cases, some reordering technique like the Multiple Minimal Degree (MMD) ordering [12], may help reduce the number of levels so as to increase parallelism. However, in general, the performance of solving a sparse triangular system on GPUs is lower than that on CPUs, especially for triangular systems obtained from high-fill-in factorizations which usually have a large number of levels.…”
Section: Gpu Implementationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For some cases, some reordering technique like the Multiple Minimal Degree (MMD) ordering [12], may help reduce the number of levels so as to increase parallelism. However, in general, the performance of solving a sparse triangular system on GPUs is lower than that on CPUs, especially for triangular systems obtained from high-fill-in factorizations which usually have a large number of levels.…”
Section: Gpu Implementationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This preserves the original combination of equations into groups. In addition, the amount of data in the adjacency graph for the FE model's nodes is much less than that in the adjacency graph for the sparse matrix's structure, therefore the well-known reordering algorithms [7,8,17,18] work much faster here.…”
Section: Decomposition Of Sparse Matrix a Into Dense Rectangular Submmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Practical implementations of sparse Cholesky factorization therefore rely on heuristics to compute some ordering with an acceptable number of fill-in. Examples of such heuristic approaches include minimum degree [13] and nested dissection [14].…”
Section: Sparse Cholesky Factorizationmentioning
confidence: 99%