2017
DOI: 10.15678/eber.2017.050408
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Evolution of the Virtuality Phenomenon in Organisations: A Critical Literature Review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The topic of remote work has been covered extensively in published research, often with a focus on virtuality as a central component. Orhan (2017), specifically in context of teams, concluded that virtuality had been defined in at least 10 different ways, though, as argued by Raghuram et al (2019), “common to these definitions are geographic dispersion and dependence on technology in work-related interactions between employees” (p. 1), but that other elements of these definitions vary. These two key characteristics of virtuality align with the definition of telecommuting presented by Nicklin et al (2016): work that “(a) occurs outside the traditional workplace and (b) uses (information communication technology [ICT]) equipment to maintain some level of presence” (p. 43), with ICTs generally recognized as tools that aid in the storage, analysis, or transmission of data or information (e.g., laptop, internet access, email, web conferencing).…”
Section: Defining Remote Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The topic of remote work has been covered extensively in published research, often with a focus on virtuality as a central component. Orhan (2017), specifically in context of teams, concluded that virtuality had been defined in at least 10 different ways, though, as argued by Raghuram et al (2019), “common to these definitions are geographic dispersion and dependence on technology in work-related interactions between employees” (p. 1), but that other elements of these definitions vary. These two key characteristics of virtuality align with the definition of telecommuting presented by Nicklin et al (2016): work that “(a) occurs outside the traditional workplace and (b) uses (information communication technology [ICT]) equipment to maintain some level of presence” (p. 43), with ICTs generally recognized as tools that aid in the storage, analysis, or transmission of data or information (e.g., laptop, internet access, email, web conferencing).…”
Section: Defining Remote Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is not currently a precise way to define degree of virtuality when it comes to remote work. Orhan (2017) reviewed numerous definitions, arguing that the literature is “loaded with many different (and sometimes even conflicting) dimensions” (p. 183). In his content review of the literature, he argued that degree of virtuality is probably best determined by the amount of face-to-face interaction that occurs.…”
Section: Defining Remote Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Online news is a well-researched field, with many good reasons why artificial intelligence (AI) techniques have the potential to improve the way we consume news online (Orhan, 2017;Mazurek et al, 2019). At the same time, news is a biased form of media that is increasingly driven by content that can sell advertising.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Organizational distension of virtual team work (Gilson, et al , 2015) and electronic leadership (e-leadership) (Annunzio, 2001) has reorganized team experiences in the status quo given that membership composition changes regularly (Orhan, 2017) and that mobile technologies are used ubiquitously (Vartiainen, 2006; Ylikauppila, et al , 2014). Principal among mobile technologies is the smartphone, a device used by half of the global population (We are social, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%