1999
DOI: 10.1109/35.783124
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The evolution of transport network survivability

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Protection schemes are typically faster than restoration. Recovery time under 50 ms can be provided [14,15]. Varying protection levels can be provisioned, ranging from 1+1, 1:1, to 1:N depending on user demands and budgetary constraints.…”
Section: Network Survivability Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Protection schemes are typically faster than restoration. Recovery time under 50 ms can be provided [14,15]. Varying protection levels can be provisioned, ranging from 1+1, 1:1, to 1:N depending on user demands and budgetary constraints.…”
Section: Network Survivability Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reliability issues for the WDM rings have already been considered in the literature (see, e.g., References [8,9]). The main contribution of this paper is to propose the path accommodation methods for the OCTDM rings by incorporating the existing reliability techniques.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The traditional restoration methods of SDH/SONET networks, currently the primary metropolitan area transport networks, have been studied extensively. In the ring topology, the self-healing ring (SHR) architectures (bidirectional SHR and unidirectional SHR) are widely used in telecommunication networks [1,2]. SHR has fast restoration time (450 ms) with simple and standardised protocols, but the spare capacity required for restoration reaches nearly half of the total transmission capacity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%