2019
DOI: 10.17116/klinderma20191801171
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The evolution of views on mental disorders in patients with syphilis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The relationship between severe infection and specific psychiatric syndromes remains to be explored. Back in the early days of psychiatry as a medical specialty, solving similar problems associated with syphilis and progressive paralysis took more than 100 years ( 25 ). Computational psychiatry is considered a promising methodology for assessing complex clinical events with a large number of factors and predictors that can lead to ambiguous clinical conditions in patients ( 26 , 27 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The relationship between severe infection and specific psychiatric syndromes remains to be explored. Back in the early days of psychiatry as a medical specialty, solving similar problems associated with syphilis and progressive paralysis took more than 100 years ( 25 ). Computational psychiatry is considered a promising methodology for assessing complex clinical events with a large number of factors and predictors that can lead to ambiguous clinical conditions in patients ( 26 , 27 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The relationship between severe infection and specific psychiatric syndromes remains to be explored. Back in the early days of psychiatry as a medical specialty, solving similar problems associated with syphilis and progressive paralysis took more than 100 years [24]. Computational psychiatry is considered a promising methodology for assessing complex clinical events with a large number of factors and predictors that can lead to ambiguous clinical conditions in patients [25,26].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%