2021
DOI: 10.1080/10345329.2021.1988248
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The evolution of youth justice conferencing in Queensland, 1990–2021

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 30 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Juvenile diversion programs gained considerable traction in the late 1960s to 1980s in response to growing recognition that the imposition of punitive sanctions through the formal juvenile justice system should only be used as a “last resort” when dealing with juvenile offending (Chapin & Griffin, 2005, p. 163). Since then, the use of juvenile diversion programs in various jurisdictions around the world has continued to be popular, with programs taking various forms (e.g., juvenile courts, youth mental health diversion, youth justice conferencing) (see Fox et al, 2021; Price et al, 2022; Singer, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Juvenile diversion programs gained considerable traction in the late 1960s to 1980s in response to growing recognition that the imposition of punitive sanctions through the formal juvenile justice system should only be used as a “last resort” when dealing with juvenile offending (Chapin & Griffin, 2005, p. 163). Since then, the use of juvenile diversion programs in various jurisdictions around the world has continued to be popular, with programs taking various forms (e.g., juvenile courts, youth mental health diversion, youth justice conferencing) (see Fox et al, 2021; Price et al, 2022; Singer, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%