2005
DOI: 10.1007/s11219-004-5259-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Evolution Path for Industrial Software Quality Evaluation Methods Applying ISO/IEC 9126:2001 Quality Model: Example of MITRE?s SQAE Method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The ISO questionnaire was used by the nontechnical respondents and comprised of the following criteria: Functionality, Efficiency, Compatibility, Usability, Reliability, Security, Maintainability, and Portability. Using a five-point rating scale, where 5 as Very High and 1 as Very Low [4]. Tables 1 and 2 describe the rating scales used in this study.…”
Section: Methodology 21 Instruments Usedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ISO questionnaire was used by the nontechnical respondents and comprised of the following criteria: Functionality, Efficiency, Compatibility, Usability, Reliability, Security, Maintainability, and Portability. Using a five-point rating scale, where 5 as Very High and 1 as Very Low [4]. Tables 1 and 2 describe the rating scales used in this study.…”
Section: Methodology 21 Instruments Usedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to ISO9126, quality is defined as a set of features and characteristics of a product or service that bear on its ability to satisfy stated or implied needs. In order to provide a developer view of software, besides the end user's view and guidelines for overall assessment of quality (Cote et al, 2005) the latest revision of four-part ISO9126 software quality standard has been proposed.…”
Section: Software Quality Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order for it to be practical however it must be seen in the light of a specific application domain. Adopting and adapting ISO 9126 for specific domains is not new and not foreign to the standard itself (Losavio, 2004;Cote, 2005). A usual approach is to enhance the hierarchical and (by design) open scheme to include more attributes suitable for a domain (Stefani & Xenos, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%