1960
DOI: 10.2307/2405995
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Evolutionary Dynamics of Complex Polymorphisms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
304
2
9

Year Published

1969
1969
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 419 publications
(316 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
304
2
9
Order By: Relevance
“…The classical LD coefficient measuring deviation from random association between alleles at different loci is delta (D). 31 D is the absolute measure of LD; it is defined by the difference between the observed haplotype frequency and the haplotype frequency that would be expected from the genotype frequency of the alleles in the haplotype, in the absence of LD. We calculated the D for the 5 locus haplotypes and also for all possible 2 locus haplotypes.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The classical LD coefficient measuring deviation from random association between alleles at different loci is delta (D). 31 D is the absolute measure of LD; it is defined by the difference between the observed haplotype frequency and the haplotype frequency that would be expected from the genotype frequency of the alleles in the haplotype, in the absence of LD. We calculated the D for the 5 locus haplotypes and also for all possible 2 locus haplotypes.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The result of Liberman and Feldman (2005) for the case where the major loci are in linkage disequilibrium at the equilibrium with M 1 fixed at the modifier locus utilizes knowledge of a class of equilibria which can be obtained in closed form, in terms of r, for the Lewontin and Kojima (1960) symmetric viability model. The Lewontin-Kojima model is a special case of the general two-locus symmetric viability model introduced by Bodmer and Felsenstein (1967), where the fitness matrix W takes the form If we denote by x 1 , x 2 , x 3 , x 4 the frequencies of the four gametes AB, Ab, aB, ab, respectively, then this two-locus, two-allele viability model with recombination rate r between the two loci has symmetric equilibria (x̂1, x̂2, x̂3, x̂4) with…”
Section: The Interaction Matrix δmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They also showed that in the special case where W add is alsosymmetric, α 1 = α 3 and β 1 = β 3 , in which case for all ε W = W add + εΔ is a special case of the Lewontin and Kojima (1960) symmetric fitness matrix, if the initial state where M 1 is fixed is in linkage disequilibrium (D ≠ 0) with the major loci, then for positive r and R, M 2 increases in frequency if (ε 2 -ε 1 ) is small and ε 2 >ε 1 > 0.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Suppose that the frequency of A1A1B1B1 is close to 1, so that the frequency of A1B1 is also close to 1 and the frequencies of the other gametes are small. If Cj, c, c and c are the frequencies of the gametes A1B1, A2B1, A1B2, A2B2 going to make up the following generation then the recurrence relations for gamete frequencies (Lewontin and Kojima, 1960) show that, in particular,…”
Section: Additive Fitnessesmentioning
confidence: 99%