2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.avb.2015.05.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The evolutionary neuroandrogenic theory of criminal behavior expanded

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 275 publications
(223 reference statements)
0
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the different scores of the four factors that determine Hare's PCL-R seem to point out differences in the phenotypic expression of psychopathy in the male and female gender. The reasons for these differences are not completely clear (Logan, 2009), but they seem to be due to several factors: genetic factors (Goldman & Ducci, 2007;Hoyenga, 1995), other biological factors (Ellis, 2011), primary emotion processing deficits (Miller & Lynam, 2003), and psychological, cultural, and social factors (Campbell, 2002;Lippa, 2005). Therefore, psychopathic women should have lower PCL-R F2 scores compared with male psychopathic subjects (Verona, Sprague, & Sadeh, 2012), who usually have a more antisocial and violent profile.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the different scores of the four factors that determine Hare's PCL-R seem to point out differences in the phenotypic expression of psychopathy in the male and female gender. The reasons for these differences are not completely clear (Logan, 2009), but they seem to be due to several factors: genetic factors (Goldman & Ducci, 2007;Hoyenga, 1995), other biological factors (Ellis, 2011), primary emotion processing deficits (Miller & Lynam, 2003), and psychological, cultural, and social factors (Campbell, 2002;Lippa, 2005). Therefore, psychopathic women should have lower PCL-R F2 scores compared with male psychopathic subjects (Verona, Sprague, & Sadeh, 2012), who usually have a more antisocial and violent profile.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several methodological characteristics from each study were coded to determine the degree to which they influence the effect size estimates, which can be observed in table . First, because the 2D:4D ratio may be linked more strongly with some behaviors than with others (Ellis and Hoskin, ), we created a categorical variable for the type of outcome and coded for whether each effect size corresponded to aggression, risky/impulsive behavior (i.e., risk‐taking and sensation‐seeking behaviors and behavioral measures of impulsivity), or criminal behavior (i.e., violent and nonviolent offending). Most effect sizes in the sample correspond to aggression ( n = 335, 50.8 percent) and risky/impulsive behaviors ( n = 237, 35.9 percent), and a smaller portion involves criminal offending ( n = 88, 13.3 percent).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, aggressive behavior came about as a natural part of human evolution, among males in particular (Ellis, Das, and Buker, ; see also Batrinos, ). This happened, scholars argued, as an evolutionary response to competition surrounding female mating preferences, where females generally prefer dominant males to submissive ones (Ellis, , ; Ellis and Hoskin, ). Second, and relatedly, exposure to certain androgens—a class of hormones including testosterone—alters brain neurochemistry, especially when that exposure occurs in the prenatal environment (Carre and Olmstead, ; Manning et al., ).…”
Section: Criminology Biosocial Perspectives and The 2d:4d Ratiomentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…order to explain consistently observed patterns in criminal offending Ellis 1988;Ellis and Hoskin 2015;Mishra and Lalumière 2008;see also Camilleri 2012;Camilleri and Stiver 2014;Lalumière et al 2008 for additional evolutionary treatments of chronic criminality, as well as the evolution of related phenotypes like psychopathy). At a proximal level (where most criminological theorizing has focused), Moffitt (1993Moffitt ( , 2006 offered evidence that there are at least two groups of offenders in the population: life-coursepersistent (LCP) offenders and adolescence-limited (AL) offenders.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%