Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen:Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte.
Terms of use:
Documents in EconStor may
AbstractThis paper contains a theoretical and empirical study of sacrifice ratios with long-lived effects, including possible strong persistence effects, or even hysteresis effects. The empirical analysis is based on G-7 quarterly output data as well as unemployment data from 1960 to 1999. In this paper, I develop some new methods to measure sacrifice ratios with long-lived effects. I reach four conclusions: First, sacrifice ratios with long-lived effects are larger than sacrifice ratios that do not account for long-lived effects. Second, from a theoretical model and simulation, the "standard method" of measuring sacrifice ratios by Ball (1994) has a larger downward bias for countries with larger long-lived effects. Third, both random and fixed effect models show that there is a negative relationship between sacrifice ratios and initial inflations, which can provide one explanation of the large magnitude of sacrifice ratios with long-lived effects in the 1990s, compared with other periods. Fourth, there is no significant negative relationship between sacrifice ratios with long-lived effects and nominal wage rigidities.