2013
DOI: 10.17489/biohun/2013/2/07
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The examination of aerogel composite artificial bone substitutes in animal models

Abstract: AbsztraktA Debreceni Egyetem Ortopédiai Klinikája, valamint a Szervetlen és Analitikai Kémiai Tanszéke egy OTKA pályázat keretében szuperkritikus körülmények között hidroxiapatitot, trikalcium-foszfátot és szilika aerogélt tartalmazó kompoz itokat állított elő, amely a csontban különböző okokból kialakult súlyos folytonossági hiány pótlására szolgálhat. Bár a kialakult csonthiány pótlására a saját csont beültetése lenne a legkedvezőbb, hiszen a szervezet azt fogadja be a legnagyobb valószínűséggel, azonban a d… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Aerogels are 3D porous nanostructured materials with exceptional physical properties, such as extremely low densities (0.003–0.5 g cm –3 ), high specific surface areas (100–1200 m 2 g –1 ), high porosities (80–99.9%), and tunable surface and bulk chemistries. , Thanks to these promising features, they can be considered interesting, supportive templates for bone formation. However, the lack of micron-sized porosity and poor mechanical strength combined with poor machinability or shaping to a sophisticated construct are still important bottlenecks, which should be mitigated to achieve a real breakthrough in aerogel-mediated BTE. , Therefore, further research on aerogels is required to (1) develop robust processing techniques to confer controlled macroporosity to aerogel for host cell colonization, (2) improve the aerogel synthesis method to achieve a mechanically strong scaffold that can temporarily substitute natural tissues without compromising the biocompatibility of the materials, and (3) allow the incorporation of bioactive compounds (e.g., growth factor) in high yields to impart bioactivity to respective scaffolds and promote new tissue growth. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aerogels are 3D porous nanostructured materials with exceptional physical properties, such as extremely low densities (0.003–0.5 g cm –3 ), high specific surface areas (100–1200 m 2 g –1 ), high porosities (80–99.9%), and tunable surface and bulk chemistries. , Thanks to these promising features, they can be considered interesting, supportive templates for bone formation. However, the lack of micron-sized porosity and poor mechanical strength combined with poor machinability or shaping to a sophisticated construct are still important bottlenecks, which should be mitigated to achieve a real breakthrough in aerogel-mediated BTE. , Therefore, further research on aerogels is required to (1) develop robust processing techniques to confer controlled macroporosity to aerogel for host cell colonization, (2) improve the aerogel synthesis method to achieve a mechanically strong scaffold that can temporarily substitute natural tissues without compromising the biocompatibility of the materials, and (3) allow the incorporation of bioactive compounds (e.g., growth factor) in high yields to impart bioactivity to respective scaffolds and promote new tissue growth. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some aerogel formulations have found an applicability for being used as biocompatible bone graft [56] and dental substitutes [49].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In vivo, hydroxyapatite layer formation occurs only in the active cellular remodelling phase of the bone tissues, and no hydroxyapatite is formed spontaneously just by contact with the blood serum. Furthermore, the same types of aerogel-based ceramic materials were studied in vivo earlier in a series of animal experiments and showed excellent bioactivities in rats [56,57]. From the results, we must conclude that the better we approach the physiological conditions, the less reliable the in vitro tests are, and it is not recommended to rank or sort off the artificial bone substitute materials only on the basis of their in vitro performances.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%