2012
DOI: 10.1093/imrn/rns161
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Exceptional Zero Conjecture for Symmetric Powers of CM Modular Forms: the Ordinary Case

Abstract: We prove the exceptional zero conjecture for the symmetric powers of CM cuspidal eigenforms at ordinary primes. In other words, we determine the trivial zeroes of the associated p-adic Lfunctions, compute the L-invariants, and show that they agree with Greenberg's L-invariants.In an appendix, we prove a functional equation for some of the p-adic L-functions we construct.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We point out that the analytic L-invariant for CM forms has already been studied in literature [DD97,Har12,HL13]. Note also that our choice of periods is not optimal [Ros13b, §6].…”
Section: Which Is the Pole Of The Kubota Leopoldt P-adic L-function)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We point out that the analytic L-invariant for CM forms has already been studied in literature [DD97,Har12,HL13]. Note also that our choice of periods is not optimal [Ros13b, §6].…”
Section: Which Is the Pole Of The Kubota Leopoldt P-adic L-function)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3. Symmetric powers of CM-modular forms (Harron 2013;Harron and Lei to appear). The associated p-adic representation V is either crystalline or potentially crystalline at p and we do need the theory of .…”
Section: Extra Zerosmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(b) The L-invariants of all symmetric powers in the p-ordinary CM case have been treated in [Har11].…”
Section: R Harronmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another exception comes again from Greenberg's original article [Gre94], where he computed his L-invariant when E has good ordinary reduction at p and has complex multiplication. In this case, the symmetric powers are reducible and the value of the L-invariant comes down to the result of Ferrero-Greenberg [FG78]; see the author's article [Har11] for the details in the more general case of a CM modular form. The general difficulty in the crystalline case is that Greenberg's L-invariant is then a global invariant and its computation requires the construction of a global Galois cohomology class.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%