The excess volatility puzzle explained by financial noise amplification from endogenous feedbacks

Abstract

The arguably most important paradox of financial economics—the excess volatility puzzle—first identified by Robert Shiller in 1981 states that asset prices fluctuate much more than information about their fundamental value. We show that this phenomenon is associated with an intrinsic propensity for financial markets to evolve towards instabilities. These properties, exemplified for two major financial markets, the foreign exchange and equity futures markets, can be expected to be generic in other complex systems where excess fluctuations result from the interplay between exogenous driving and endogenous feedback. Using an exact mapping of the key property (volatility/variance) of the price diffusion process onto that of a point process (arrival intensity of price changes), together with a self-excited epidemic model, we introduce a novel decomposition of the volatility of price fluctuations into an exogenous (i.e. efficient) component and an endogenous (i.e. inefficient) excess component. The endogenous excess volatility is found to be substantial, largely stable at longer time scales and thus provides a plausible explanation for the excess volatility puzzle. Our theory rationalises the remarkable fact that small stochastic exogenous fluctuations at the micro-scale of milliseconds to seconds are renormalised into long-term excess volatility with an amplification factor of around 5 for equity futures and 2 for exchange rates, in line with models including economic fundamentals explicitly.

Capital Gains Due to Changes in the Market Discount Rate and Workers’ Welfare

“…It should be noted at the outset that in a perfect foresight world none of the capital gains analyzed in the general equilibrium model would affect workers' welfare. But given the vast literature on excess volatility (for a recent example, see Wehrli & Sornette, 2022) and the facts that papers such as R&S are trying ex post to explain the secular decline in interest rates, it seems plausible that some of the non-recurring capital gains over the last 50 years have been unexpected. This section analyzes how the welfare of the life-cycle workers in the general equilibrium model are affected by such unexpected capital gains.…”

Forecasting Volatility Persistence: Evidence from International Stock Markets

“…The interaction between these heterogeneous agents can create feedback loops and amplification mechanisms, contributing to the persistence of volatility (Wehrli & Sornette, 2022). Considering these theoretical explanations of volatility persistence and the current economic climate, this study seeks to answer the following questions; Are there empirical evidence of volatility clustering in financial markets?…”