1997
DOI: 10.1086/209710
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Exchange-Rate Risk Exposure of Asset Returns

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
131
3
3

Year Published

1999
1999
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 250 publications
(145 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
8
131
3
3
Order By: Relevance
“…From (3), it can be redrawn as: (5) From (5) (6) represents Kronecker product, C represents p x n(1+n(p+d)) constraint matrix. The assumption of No Granger causality can be redraw as H0: Cβ=0.…”
Section: Toda-yamamoto Causalitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…From (3), it can be redrawn as: (5) From (5) (6) represents Kronecker product, C represents p x n(1+n(p+d)) constraint matrix. The assumption of No Granger causality can be redraw as H0: Cβ=0.…”
Section: Toda-yamamoto Causalitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are also many overseas conclusions that the relationship between Exchange rate and stock prices does not exist. Chow [6], using stock market monthly data, found that the correlation between Exchange rate and stock prices is not significant. Yang and Doong [7] using EGARCH method to analyze seven western countries, the result does not come to the conclusion of the correlation between the two.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Bahmani-Oskooee and Sohrabian, 1992), using monthly values of S&P 500 index and US dollar effective exchange rate over the period of 1973-1998, and employing co-integration analysis and the Granger causality test, showed that there was a bidirectional causality in the short run and no long run relationship between these two variables. On the other hand, (Chow et al, 1997) conducted this issue in the same markets with a longer time horizon, and found a positive relationship between stock returns and real exchange rate returns. (Ajayi and Mougoue, 1996) employed the co-integration and causality tests on daily stock indices and exchange rates in eight industrial economies during the period 1985-1991.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…16 Not only is unexpected inflation useful as a real value hedge for liability management (see Leibowitz and Henriksson [1988]), but may also be useful in explaining asset class behavior (Bodie [1976]; Nelson [1976]; Jaffe and Mandelker [1976]; Fama and Schwert [1977]; Chen et al [1986]; Elton et al [1995]; Brandt and Wang [2003]; Ludvigson and Ng [2009]). 17 Similar to the unexpected inflation factor, unexpected changes in the dollar exchange rate is not only useful as a hedge for liability management, but may also be useful in explaining asset class behavior (Agarwal and Naik [2004]; Hasanhodzic and Lo [2007]; Ferson and Harvey [1993]; Chow et al [1997]). Further, there is general consensus regarding the advantages of hedging foreign currency exposure in fixed income and developed equities (Perold and Schulman [1988]; Kritzman [1993]; Eun and Resnick [1988]; Campbell et al [2010]).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%