The Exclusion of Compulsory Proceedings Entailing Binding Decisions in Light of the Southern Bluefin Tuna and South China Sea Arbitrations

Kamalnath, Anthea Jay

doi:10.2139/ssrn.3831590

Cited by 1 publication

(2 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Vì vậy, theo ông, nếu tranh chấp này phát sinh từ cả UNCLOS và thoả thuận khu vực thì thủ tục giải quyết tranh chấp được trù định tại thoả thuận khu vực có thể được áp dụng thay cho thủ tục của UNCLOS. 15 Thẩm phán Anderson cũng không đồng ý với ý kiến của ITLOS rằng chỉ các cơ chế của UNCLOS mới có thể giải quyết tranh chấp liên quan đến việc giải thích hoặc áp dụng UNCLOS mà không phải điều ước nào khác. 16 Trong khi đó, Thẩm phán Wolfrum và Tullio Treves bày tỏ ủng hộ kết luận của ITLOS.…”

Section: Các đIều Kiện Theo đIều 282unclassified

See 1 more Smart Citation

Concluding Bilateral and Regional Agreements relating to Maritime Disputes: Possible Implications for the Compulsory Dispute Settlement Mechanisms under the 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea

Hao

Ha²

2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In the midst of recent complicated developments in the East Sea (South China Sea), ASEAN member states and China have concluded a number of bilateral and regional agreements to manage disputes and promote maritime cooperation. This demonstrates efforts of the parties to enhance trust, prevent conflicts, and create a favorable environment for dispute settlement. The conclusion of bilateral and regional agreements, however, also raises concerns over possible implications for the compulsory dispute settlement mechanisms under the 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) as UNCLOS contains provisions that enable bilateral and regional agreements to preclude its compulsory procedures. This paper will look into the compulsory nature of UNCLOS dispute settlements mechanisms. It will then examine the conditions for bilateral and regional agreements to preclude UNCLOS compulsory dispute settlement mechanisms. Finally, it will assess possible implications of agreements that have been concluded between ASEAN member states and China in the South China Sea for the compulsory dispute settlements under UNCLOS.

show abstract

Section: Các đIều Kiện Theo đIều 282unclassified

“…Trên thực tế, ở giai đoạn thủ tục trọng tài của vụ MOX Plant, Tòa trọng tài Phụ lục VII tuy cho ________ 15 Ý kiến riêng của Thẩm phán Jesus, các đoạn 2-8. 16 Ý kiến riêng của Thẩm phán Anderson.…”

Section: Các đIều Kiện Theo đIều 282unclassified

Concluding Bilateral and Regional Agreements relating to Maritime Disputes: Possible Implications for the Compulsory Dispute Settlement Mechanisms under the 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea

Hao

Ha²

2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

The Exclusion of Compulsory Proceedings Entailing Binding Decisions in Light of the Southern Bluefin Tuna and South China Sea Arbitrations

Cited by 1 publication

References 0 publications

Concluding Bilateral and Regional Agreements relating to Maritime Disputes: Possible Implications for the Compulsory Dispute Settlement Mechanisms under the 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea

Concluding Bilateral and Regional Agreements relating to Maritime Disputes: Possible Implications for the Compulsory Dispute Settlement Mechanisms under the 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About