2019
DOI: 10.1038/s41586-019-1038-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The expanding landscape of ‘oncohistone’ mutations in human cancers

Abstract: Mutations in epigenetic pathways are common oncogenic drivers. Histones, the fundamental substrate for chromatin-modifying and remodeling enzymes, are mutated in tumors including in gliomas, sarcomas, head and neck cancers, and carcinosarcomas. Classical 'oncohistone' mutations occur in the N-terminal tail of histone H3 and impact the function of Polycomb Repressor Complexes 1 and 2. However, the prevalence and function of histone mutations in additional tumor contexts is unknown. Here we show that somatic his… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

8
375
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 325 publications
(384 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
8
375
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The case of M. stadtmanae Msp_0383 illustrates that substitutions of individual amino acids can have strong effects on histone properties and, ultimately, chromatin state. This is also true in eukaryotes (Maze et al 2014;Henikoff and Smith 2015;Nacev et al 2019). H3.3 and H3.1, for example, differ in only four amino acids (three of which are located in the histone fold domain), but are recognized by different chaperones, deposited at defined locations along the genome, and make distinct, non-redundant contributions to genome function, notably during gametogenesis (Talbert and Henikoff 2010;Filipescu et al 2014;Wollmann et al 2017).…”
Section: Single Amino Acid Changes Underpin Functional Differences Bementioning
confidence: 73%
“…The case of M. stadtmanae Msp_0383 illustrates that substitutions of individual amino acids can have strong effects on histone properties and, ultimately, chromatin state. This is also true in eukaryotes (Maze et al 2014;Henikoff and Smith 2015;Nacev et al 2019). H3.3 and H3.1, for example, differ in only four amino acids (three of which are located in the histone fold domain), but are recognized by different chaperones, deposited at defined locations along the genome, and make distinct, non-redundant contributions to genome function, notably during gametogenesis (Talbert and Henikoff 2010;Filipescu et al 2014;Wollmann et al 2017).…”
Section: Single Amino Acid Changes Underpin Functional Differences Bementioning
confidence: 73%
“…Conversely, other modifications on the H3 tail could themselves impact H3.3 S31 modification and in this respect, the effects of mutations affecting neighboring residues will be interesting to explore. Notably, as H3.3 S31 is close to residues often mutated in aggressive cancers such as H3 K27M and G34R in pediatric glioblastoma [42][43][44]47,96 , it will be interesting to evaluate the impact of these onco-histone mutations on H3.3-specific phosphorylation as well. Altogether, we show that H3.3 S31 is the key residue that confers specific functions to H3.3 within chromatin, compared with its H3.2 counterpart.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many of the processes dependent on H3K36me3 are ubiquitous and highly conserved from yeast to humans. Additionally, H3K36 oncohistone mutations 72 and loss of the H3K36me3 methyltransferase SETD2 73 both play important roles during cancer development. In particular, lysine-tomethionine mutations of H3K36 (H3K36M) contribute to distinct subtypes of sarcomas and pediatric chondroblastoma 74,75 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%