2006
DOI: 10.1111/j.1748-720x.2006.00024.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Expanding Use of DNA in Law Enforcement: What Role for Privacy?

Abstract: DNA identification is being used in ever‐widening ways, including databases of greater scope, familial and lowstringency searches, and DNA dragnets. After examining the law enforcement and privacy interests, the article concludes that forensic DNA uses must be consistent with privacy and civil liberties.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
23
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
23
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast with H 2 , being more familiar with the Italian criminal justice system was related to weaker support for the DNA database, in line with the results found in Spain by Gamero and colleagues [31]. Some experts in forensic science have raised concerns on DNA profiling, regarding the protection of privacy and the risk of becoming a nation with unfettered police powers (in Italy [9,48]; in the USA [24,63],). In other words, in the case of a forensic DNA database, the balancing of public safety and privacy concerns may lean toward the protection of society, through government intrusion in the private sphere of individuals.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 49%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In contrast with H 2 , being more familiar with the Italian criminal justice system was related to weaker support for the DNA database, in line with the results found in Spain by Gamero and colleagues [31]. Some experts in forensic science have raised concerns on DNA profiling, regarding the protection of privacy and the risk of becoming a nation with unfettered police powers (in Italy [9,48]; in the USA [24,63],). In other words, in the case of a forensic DNA database, the balancing of public safety and privacy concerns may lean toward the protection of society, through government intrusion in the private sphere of individuals.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 49%
“…Knowledge of criminal law predicts the opinion on the Italian law concerning the forensic DNA database [24,48]. We predict that opposition to the forensic DNA database is grounded on a basic knowledge of the Italian Criminal and Criminal Procedure Code [31].…”
Section: Aims and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…When it comes to forensic evidence, especially DNA evidence, there is considerable concern that this imbalance leads to social inequalities being reinforced as already marginalized groups may be subject to power to a larger extent than others (Duster, 2006). There are also concerns about loss of (genetic) privacy (Dahl and Saetnan, 2009;Noble, 2006;Rothstein and Talbott, 2006), for example in the possibility of socalled familial searches, that is, searching DNA databases for profiles that, as partial matches, indicate a genetic relationship to the DNA found at a crime scene. 15 In this way, surveillance can be extended to persons outside of the database -and the stored DNA-profiles be made to stand in for an even wider bodily materiality, creating more potential criminal bodies.…”
Section: Co-materializationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fourth category of privacy concerns proprietary privacy, encompasses issues relating to the appropriation of individuals' possessory and economic interest in their genes and other putative bodily repositories of personality. 26 The notion of genetic exceptionalism has been challenged on the grounds of the difficulty of conceiving genetic information independently from other medical information, 27 as well as with reference to the paradigmatic skip from genetic determinism to genetic probabilism, which sees genetic information not as an imminent destiny, but as a manageable risk or even chance. 28 But risk is no less frightening than destiny, as the discussion about the right not to know genetic predispositions has shown.…”
Section: Genetic Exeptionalismmentioning
confidence: 99%