2009
DOI: 10.1111/j.1744-1714.2009.01074.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Expectation of Continuity Effect and Franchise Termination Laws: A Behavioral Perspective

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The primary reason that franchisees and their associations tend to disfavor liberal termination rights for franchisors is that they fear franchisor opportunism (e.g., Benoliel, ). For example, franchisee associations argue that franchisors have strong interests in terminating franchisees who are not producing the royalty levels that the franchisor believes can be extracted from a particular location.…”
Section: Bargaining Power Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The primary reason that franchisees and their associations tend to disfavor liberal termination rights for franchisors is that they fear franchisor opportunism (e.g., Benoliel, ). For example, franchisee associations argue that franchisors have strong interests in terminating franchisees who are not producing the royalty levels that the franchisor believes can be extracted from a particular location.…”
Section: Bargaining Power Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Franchisees also fear that franchisors can be motivated to opportunistically terminate a franchisee who is organizing a franchisee association, or is otherwise viewed as “non‐cooperative” or as “a troublemaker.” These kinds of fears have been fed by a long history of contentious lawsuits over terminations that franchisee associations and other franchisee advocates actively publicize (e.g., Benoliel ). Franchisee concerns are also heightened by the fact that it is usually difficult for outside observers to know who was acting opportunistically in a given act of termination.…”
Section: Bargaining Power Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the business growth of franchising is expected to move in a positive direction for market continuity to remain in place, the intensity of the effect will usually differ for the franchisor as much as for the franchisee, due to possible opportunistic behaviours by one or the other party. Both the franchisor and the franchisee, however, have an expectation of continuity, generated by the mutual perception of a continuous economic relationship (Benoliel, 2009;Facanha, Resende, Cardoso, & Schr€ oder, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is reflected in an increased likelihood of the franchisor initiating litigation and a decreased likelihood of it settling for anything less than its full claim. In relationship law regimes, franchisors can attempt to terminate franchisees only with good cause (Benoliel 2009). Although relationship law statutes were created to ensure continuity of the relationship and to protect franchisees from termination at the whim of the franchisors, they also have two potentially unanticipated outcomes.…”
Section: Impact Of Regulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although these laws are long-standing (both were enacted in 1974), such regulation of franchising has always been controversial. Whereas supporters of regulation laud the transparency and the “franchisee day in court” elicited by such laws (Benoliel 2009), its detractors cite the high cost of compliance and the additional burden it imposes on the franchisor's task of quality assurance (Brickley, Dark, and Weisbach 1991; Klein 1980).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%